Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wands? - Anyone use?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 1732921" data-attributes="member: 478"><p>To refine somewhat, what I think... (EDIT: See post below also <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />)</p><p> </p><p> I think the most important factor to derive the cost of a magic item is the effect of the item. While the spell level is often (not always) used as a guideline in magic item creation, the final cost is based purely on the effect. There are several examples, where the final cost is lower or higher than what the formula would suggest. Also the cost for a magic item should be the same, regardless of who makes the item, since it is based on the effect and not the creator.</p><p> </p><p> The information at which spell level an item is created is not part of the item's description, therefore it should be assumed, that it is always the lowest possible. A <em>wand of hold person</em> uses 2nd spell level, a <em>wand of continual flame</em> uses 2nd spell level. Anything else is a different item, i.e. <em>wand of hold person (heightened to 3rd spell level)</em>.</p><p> </p><p> The prerequisites to create a magic item does not really include the spell level. A wizard, being able to cast <em>hold monster</em> is able to make a <em>wand of hold monster</em>, since it is generally possible to make such an item, since the spell exists as a 4th level spell, a <em>wand of hold monster</em> also exists.</p><p> </p><p> Therefore, I think that for magic item creation a spellcaster should be able to create an item based on the lowest spell level at which a spell is available to any class (prestige classes can be happily ignored here, I guess <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />). Also a spellcaster should be able to make the item based on the spell level at which his or her class has the spell in question available (if possible, for example in case of the wand it would not be possible), this is similar to using a <em>heightened</em> spell then. Even without knowing the Heighten Spell feat, a wizard could make a <em>wand of hold person (heightened to 3rd spell level)</em> then, but the wizard could also make a <em>wand of hold person</em>, since he or she has the prerequisites for it (at 5th class level or higher, caster level would be 3rd then, of course).</p><p> </p><p> To summarize, a spellcaster should be able to create an item based on the spell's actual spell level for his or her class and the lowest spell level for any class.</p><p> </p><p> Bye</p><p> Thanee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thanee, post: 1732921, member: 478"] To refine somewhat, what I think... (EDIT: See post below also :)) I think the most important factor to derive the cost of a magic item is the effect of the item. While the spell level is often (not always) used as a guideline in magic item creation, the final cost is based purely on the effect. There are several examples, where the final cost is lower or higher than what the formula would suggest. Also the cost for a magic item should be the same, regardless of who makes the item, since it is based on the effect and not the creator. The information at which spell level an item is created is not part of the item's description, therefore it should be assumed, that it is always the lowest possible. A [i]wand of hold person[/i] uses 2nd spell level, a [i]wand of continual flame[/i] uses 2nd spell level. Anything else is a different item, i.e. [i]wand of hold person (heightened to 3rd spell level)[/i]. The prerequisites to create a magic item does not really include the spell level. A wizard, being able to cast [i]hold monster[/i] is able to make a [i]wand of hold monster[/i], since it is generally possible to make such an item, since the spell exists as a 4th level spell, a [i]wand of hold monster[/i] also exists. Therefore, I think that for magic item creation a spellcaster should be able to create an item based on the lowest spell level at which a spell is available to any class (prestige classes can be happily ignored here, I guess ;)). Also a spellcaster should be able to make the item based on the spell level at which his or her class has the spell in question available (if possible, for example in case of the wand it would not be possible), this is similar to using a [i]heightened[/i] spell then. Even without knowing the Heighten Spell feat, a wizard could make a [i]wand of hold person (heightened to 3rd spell level)[/i] then, but the wizard could also make a [i]wand of hold person[/i], since he or she has the prerequisites for it (at 5th class level or higher, caster level would be 3rd then, of course). To summarize, a spellcaster should be able to create an item based on the spell's actual spell level for his or her class and the lowest spell level for any class. Bye Thanee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wands? - Anyone use?
Top