Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wanting more content doesn't always equate to wanting tons of splat options so please stop.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6930936" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>Very likely because your view is that of the minority...</p><p></p><p></p><p>I doubt there's hard "proof" one way or another. Or what would even qualify as proof. </p><p>But there's a lot of small details that build a larger picture.</p><p></p><p>First, most "gamers" don't buy the books. They play, but they rely on others for the rulebooks, typically the DM. </p><p>Second, and those "gamers" that do buy the rulebook seldom buy more than the PHB. There's a reason it sells far more than the other two Core rulebooks, which in turn sell more than any other accessory. </p><p></p><p>So already we have people buying accessories as a minority.</p><p></p><p>Of the people who buy the accessories, you'll have the people who buy all and the people who don't buy all. </p><p>Gamers are an obsessive bunch by their nature, so the percentage of fans that "gotta get it all" will likely be higher than in other hobbies. I'd <em>guess</em> that the ratio of completists would be less than 50% of the dedicated fanbase (a minority), but if someone told me 51% of dedicated D&D fans bought all the books I'd probably believe it. </p><p></p><p>So fans who buy accessories are a percentage of the minority of a minority of D&D players. Right out of the gate. </p><p>Dividing that into fans who want more mechanical content versus more flavour text content will inherently further reduce the audience to an even smaller percentage. If people have an opinion at all: the fluff vs crunch division is a false dilemma; many D&D purchasers won't have a strong opinion one way or the other. </p><p></p><p>So, yes, your views are that of the minority. </p><p>Really, all our views are. Because the vast, vast majority of D&D fans won't even visit ENworld, let alone post on the forums.</p><p></p><p></p><p>D&D is doing very well. Very, very well. Likely better than any time in the last 30 years. And it's doing so despite the <strong><em>constant </em></strong>complaints of lack of splatbooks. Which started pretty much immediately prior to the DMG being released when people wanted to know what was next.</p><p>So either the vast, vast majority of D&D players just don't care or the lack of new books isn't stopping them playing and supporting the game. Either way is the same for WotC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6930936, member: 37579"] Very likely because your view is that of the minority... I doubt there's hard "proof" one way or another. Or what would even qualify as proof. But there's a lot of small details that build a larger picture. First, most "gamers" don't buy the books. They play, but they rely on others for the rulebooks, typically the DM. Second, and those "gamers" that do buy the rulebook seldom buy more than the PHB. There's a reason it sells far more than the other two Core rulebooks, which in turn sell more than any other accessory. So already we have people buying accessories as a minority. Of the people who buy the accessories, you'll have the people who buy all and the people who don't buy all. Gamers are an obsessive bunch by their nature, so the percentage of fans that "gotta get it all" will likely be higher than in other hobbies. I'd [I]guess[/I] that the ratio of completists would be less than 50% of the dedicated fanbase (a minority), but if someone told me 51% of dedicated D&D fans bought all the books I'd probably believe it. So fans who buy accessories are a percentage of the minority of a minority of D&D players. Right out of the gate. Dividing that into fans who want more mechanical content versus more flavour text content will inherently further reduce the audience to an even smaller percentage. If people have an opinion at all: the fluff vs crunch division is a false dilemma; many D&D purchasers won't have a strong opinion one way or the other. So, yes, your views are that of the minority. Really, all our views are. Because the vast, vast majority of D&D fans won't even visit ENworld, let alone post on the forums. D&D is doing very well. Very, very well. Likely better than any time in the last 30 years. And it's doing so despite the [B][I]constant [/I][/B]complaints of lack of splatbooks. Which started pretty much immediately prior to the DMG being released when people wanted to know what was next. So either the vast, vast majority of D&D players just don't care or the lack of new books isn't stopping them playing and supporting the game. Either way is the same for WotC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wanting more content doesn't always equate to wanting tons of splat options so please stop.
Top