Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
War of the Burning Sky: Thoughts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Primitive Screwhead" data-source="post: 5356372" data-attributes="member: 20805"><p>I have been running WoBS for almost two years now, in a once a month campaign. We started in 3.5 and I have been house ruling into 4e as the team here is just barely catching up to us. We are at the end of Module #7.</p><p></p><p> WoBS is, by far, the best adventure path I have ever seen. However, it is what I would consider an 'advanced' module set as the GM has alot of things to track, manage, and adjust based on the groups actions.</p><p></p><p>{MINOR SPOILERS}[SBLOCK]</p><p>On the broad scale, the adventure path ends in a Hobbitish 'war of 5 armies' and who is on which side depends on how the heroes did in earlier modules. Many bad guys are re-occuring and you have double-agents and people who just switch sides.</p><p></p><p> The initial modules are a bit rail-roady as the groups goal is to run away from the Ragesian Army, but after that you get into more free-form setups for the modules. One of the issues that the 4e version has is that they are adaptations of the 3.5 versions, in which you could easily have 7 combats in one session. Also, I think some of the writers should read Stalker0's comments on encounter building and anti-grind, as well has his Skill challenge rules.</p><p>[/SBLOCK]</p><p> Regardless of those issues, I am completely enjoying running a complex adventure with a strong back history. The path is almost a complete campaign setting.</p><p></p><p> As noted there is a sub forum here in which the authors, guiding publisher, and a number of GMs post about the modules. with HR ideas, adaptation for setting in published campaign worlds, etc. </p><p> Drop by and read some, and pick up the players guide and campaign guides.</p><p></p><p> And finally, being free for subscribers? thats a pretty good price that I wish they had when they started! <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah.. Ninja'd by RW I see!</p><p> I am looking forward to the new campaign they have planned, but still would go with WoBS... in either 3.5 or 4e.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Primitive Screwhead, post: 5356372, member: 20805"] I have been running WoBS for almost two years now, in a once a month campaign. We started in 3.5 and I have been house ruling into 4e as the team here is just barely catching up to us. We are at the end of Module #7. WoBS is, by far, the best adventure path I have ever seen. However, it is what I would consider an 'advanced' module set as the GM has alot of things to track, manage, and adjust based on the groups actions. {MINOR SPOILERS}[SBLOCK] On the broad scale, the adventure path ends in a Hobbitish 'war of 5 armies' and who is on which side depends on how the heroes did in earlier modules. Many bad guys are re-occuring and you have double-agents and people who just switch sides. The initial modules are a bit rail-roady as the groups goal is to run away from the Ragesian Army, but after that you get into more free-form setups for the modules. One of the issues that the 4e version has is that they are adaptations of the 3.5 versions, in which you could easily have 7 combats in one session. Also, I think some of the writers should read Stalker0's comments on encounter building and anti-grind, as well has his Skill challenge rules. [/SBLOCK] Regardless of those issues, I am completely enjoying running a complex adventure with a strong back history. The path is almost a complete campaign setting. As noted there is a sub forum here in which the authors, guiding publisher, and a number of GMs post about the modules. with HR ideas, adaptation for setting in published campaign worlds, etc. Drop by and read some, and pick up the players guide and campaign guides. And finally, being free for subscribers? thats a pretty good price that I wish they had when they started! :lol: Ah.. Ninja'd by RW I see! I am looking forward to the new campaign they have planned, but still would go with WoBS... in either 3.5 or 4e. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
War of the Burning Sky: Thoughts?
Top