Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warblade and Swordsage: Overpowered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="charlesatan" data-source="post: 3189828" data-attributes="member: 20870"><p>Flavor-wise, they have this Asian feel to it (much like the monk). Whether it's grouped there with Shugenja and Wu-Jen's and Samurai's (there's an underpowered class no one's complaining about) is up to you, but on the other hand, I can also envision it part of the regular D&D world (we have monks in the PHB don't we?).</p><p></p><p>As for the other classes, I think they stand well on their own even with martial adepts in the game. Monks and Rangers are significantly different from the typical Fighter archetype, and Barbarians, Fighters, Paladins definitely still have a use despite the existence of Warblades, for example.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Uh, martial adepts are quite similar to spellcasters. The maneuver progression (1st-9th level maneuvers), the fact that they're expended (you don't use the same maneuver consecutively for example), among other things. Of course they're not as powerful as spells of the same level, but they're recoverable, linked often to melee attacks, and most go through SR. So it's spell-like but not quite spells.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Uh, even if you removed Natural Spell, a Druid would still be powerful. Actually spells in itself are powerful. I mean a 20th-level, you're dealing 20d6 damage to an area (lots of targets). Or Meteor Swarm with a ranged touch attack, dealing as much as 24d6 damage to a single target plus some collateral damage.</p><p></p><p>How do non-spellcasters compete with that in terms of damage output? And if you're gonna compare that to maneuvers, even they don't deal that much damage, at least consecutively (sure, you have the 9th-level desert wind maneuver but that's it).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Martial adepts aren't broken. They're powerful, yes, but they're also not as powerful as spells. Again, even maneuvers don't deal 20d6 damage automatically. And you have to consider that 1) martial adepts can't perform the same attack consecutively except on certain occassions, 2) most of the maneuvers are linked to an attack (and it's not even a touch attack... has it ever occured to you that you'd actually miss, even with Fighter BAB?), and 3) you're melee.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="charlesatan, post: 3189828, member: 20870"] Flavor-wise, they have this Asian feel to it (much like the monk). Whether it's grouped there with Shugenja and Wu-Jen's and Samurai's (there's an underpowered class no one's complaining about) is up to you, but on the other hand, I can also envision it part of the regular D&D world (we have monks in the PHB don't we?). As for the other classes, I think they stand well on their own even with martial adepts in the game. Monks and Rangers are significantly different from the typical Fighter archetype, and Barbarians, Fighters, Paladins definitely still have a use despite the existence of Warblades, for example. Uh, martial adepts are quite similar to spellcasters. The maneuver progression (1st-9th level maneuvers), the fact that they're expended (you don't use the same maneuver consecutively for example), among other things. Of course they're not as powerful as spells of the same level, but they're recoverable, linked often to melee attacks, and most go through SR. So it's spell-like but not quite spells. Uh, even if you removed Natural Spell, a Druid would still be powerful. Actually spells in itself are powerful. I mean a 20th-level, you're dealing 20d6 damage to an area (lots of targets). Or Meteor Swarm with a ranged touch attack, dealing as much as 24d6 damage to a single target plus some collateral damage. How do non-spellcasters compete with that in terms of damage output? And if you're gonna compare that to maneuvers, even they don't deal that much damage, at least consecutively (sure, you have the 9th-level desert wind maneuver but that's it). Martial adepts aren't broken. They're powerful, yes, but they're also not as powerful as spells. Again, even maneuvers don't deal 20d6 damage automatically. And you have to consider that 1) martial adepts can't perform the same attack consecutively except on certain occassions, 2) most of the maneuvers are linked to an attack (and it's not even a touch attack... has it ever occured to you that you'd actually miss, even with Fighter BAB?), and 3) you're melee. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warblade and Swordsage: Overpowered?
Top