Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warblade and Swordsage: Overpowered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Malacoda" data-source="post: 3202066" data-attributes="member: 6345"><p>Personally, I feel that comparing a Warblade with Insightful Strike to a two-handed weapon type is the wrong approach. The Barbarian or Fighter gets no benefit from a full attack action. Their single attack is not as powerful as the Warblade’s Insightful Strike, and they have no real way to compensate.</p><p></p><p>A better choice might be a dual-weapon type, who can get a benefit from a full attack action.</p><p></p><p>For example:</p><p></p><p><strong>Dual-Weapon Specialist: </strong>Fighter 5 (Dwarf); HD 5d10+15 (47 hp); Init +2; Spd 20 ft. (4 squares); AC 17 (+5 breastplate, +2 Dexterity), touch 13, flat-footed 15; Base Atk/Grpl +5/+8; Atk +1 Dwarven Waraxe +10 melee (1d10+6/x3); Full Atk +1 Dwarven Waraxe +8 melee (1d10+6/x3) and +1 Dwarven War Axe +8 melee (1d10+4/x3) </p><p></p><p>Str 16, Dex 15, Con 16 Int 10, Wis 10, Cha 6</p><p></p><p>Feats: Two-Weapon Fighting, Over-sized Offhand Weapon, Weapon Focus (Dwarven Waraxe), Weapon Specialization (Dwarven Waraxe), 1 other feat</p><p></p><p>Against a troll (AC16), this character does an average of 13.65 damage per round it does a full attack action (65% chance to hit, 11.5 and 9.5 average damage per weapon). Over two rounds this is 27.3 points of damage.</p><p></p><p>Against the troll the warblade with the 1d20+17 damage Insightful Strike does 20.63 average damage (75% chance to hit, 27.5 average damage). On the second round it does an average of 7.88 (75% chance to hit, 10.5 average damage). Total over two rounds is 28.5.</p><p></p><p>As you can see this brings the two closer. The warblade is not dependent on the full attack action, so it has another edge over the fighter. Combine that with flexibility, and the warblade overall wins.</p><p></p><p>But, that is just 5th level. What about 6th level?</p><p></p><p>Give the Warblade Weapon Specialization and a +2 Strength item. Give the Fighter Two Weapon Pounce and Improved Two-Weapon Fighting and a +2 Dex item (so it can qualify for ITWF).</p><p></p><p>Against an Ettin (AC18) the fighter does an average of 22.05 damage when it can do a full attack action (4 attacks, 2 at 65% and 2 at 40%, same average damage). If it cannot do a full attack action but can charge, it does 13.65 damage on average. If it can full attack every round, it does 44.10 damage over two rounds. If it has to charge one round and full attack the next, it does 35.7 damage over two rounds. </p><p></p><p>The warblade’s Insightful Strike does up to 21.38 points of damage on average against the ettin, and it’s second round it full attacks for an average of 16.88 damage. Over two rounds, that is 38.25 points of damage.</p><p></p><p>In one level, the two-weapon specialist can leapfrog the warblade in shear damage, given the examples set forth. There might be other maneuver or stances or whatever that levels this back out, but given the parameters set out, the fighter isn’t doing that poorly, in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>None of my calculations include the cloak or whatever that gives +5 to Concentration checks. I know this means I am not arguing the RAW. It would add 3.75 points to the Warblade’s numbers (75% chance to hit, 5 points of damage). Personally, I find the usage of the cloak in this manner to be so cheesy I want to spread it on a cracker, but that is for individual DMs to decide. It impacts the 5th level comparison a fair amount, and shores up the difference in the 6th level comparison when full attacking.</p><p></p><p>Insightful strike is nice. Compared to some fighter-type builds it is going to look real good, but against others, like the two-weapon build, not as much.</p><p></p><p>This is only a commentary on shear damage, not other abilities. Having not read through ToB completely it is hard for me to comment much further than this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Malacoda, post: 3202066, member: 6345"] Personally, I feel that comparing a Warblade with Insightful Strike to a two-handed weapon type is the wrong approach. The Barbarian or Fighter gets no benefit from a full attack action. Their single attack is not as powerful as the Warblade’s Insightful Strike, and they have no real way to compensate. A better choice might be a dual-weapon type, who can get a benefit from a full attack action. For example: [B]Dual-Weapon Specialist: [/B]Fighter 5 (Dwarf); HD 5d10+15 (47 hp); Init +2; Spd 20 ft. (4 squares); AC 17 (+5 breastplate, +2 Dexterity), touch 13, flat-footed 15; Base Atk/Grpl +5/+8; Atk +1 Dwarven Waraxe +10 melee (1d10+6/x3); Full Atk +1 Dwarven Waraxe +8 melee (1d10+6/x3) and +1 Dwarven War Axe +8 melee (1d10+4/x3) Str 16, Dex 15, Con 16 Int 10, Wis 10, Cha 6 Feats: Two-Weapon Fighting, Over-sized Offhand Weapon, Weapon Focus (Dwarven Waraxe), Weapon Specialization (Dwarven Waraxe), 1 other feat Against a troll (AC16), this character does an average of 13.65 damage per round it does a full attack action (65% chance to hit, 11.5 and 9.5 average damage per weapon). Over two rounds this is 27.3 points of damage. Against the troll the warblade with the 1d20+17 damage Insightful Strike does 20.63 average damage (75% chance to hit, 27.5 average damage). On the second round it does an average of 7.88 (75% chance to hit, 10.5 average damage). Total over two rounds is 28.5. As you can see this brings the two closer. The warblade is not dependent on the full attack action, so it has another edge over the fighter. Combine that with flexibility, and the warblade overall wins. But, that is just 5th level. What about 6th level? Give the Warblade Weapon Specialization and a +2 Strength item. Give the Fighter Two Weapon Pounce and Improved Two-Weapon Fighting and a +2 Dex item (so it can qualify for ITWF). Against an Ettin (AC18) the fighter does an average of 22.05 damage when it can do a full attack action (4 attacks, 2 at 65% and 2 at 40%, same average damage). If it cannot do a full attack action but can charge, it does 13.65 damage on average. If it can full attack every round, it does 44.10 damage over two rounds. If it has to charge one round and full attack the next, it does 35.7 damage over two rounds. The warblade’s Insightful Strike does up to 21.38 points of damage on average against the ettin, and it’s second round it full attacks for an average of 16.88 damage. Over two rounds, that is 38.25 points of damage. In one level, the two-weapon specialist can leapfrog the warblade in shear damage, given the examples set forth. There might be other maneuver or stances or whatever that levels this back out, but given the parameters set out, the fighter isn’t doing that poorly, in my opinion. None of my calculations include the cloak or whatever that gives +5 to Concentration checks. I know this means I am not arguing the RAW. It would add 3.75 points to the Warblade’s numbers (75% chance to hit, 5 points of damage). Personally, I find the usage of the cloak in this manner to be so cheesy I want to spread it on a cracker, but that is for individual DMs to decide. It impacts the 5th level comparison a fair amount, and shores up the difference in the 6th level comparison when full attacking. Insightful strike is nice. Compared to some fighter-type builds it is going to look real good, but against others, like the two-weapon build, not as much. This is only a commentary on shear damage, not other abilities. Having not read through ToB completely it is hard for me to comment much further than this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warblade and Swordsage: Overpowered?
Top