Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warblade maneuvers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 3540119" data-attributes="member: 4134"><p>Yes, that it should, but the core material has to be balanced with itself. If the core material has parts that are just weak, supplements that resemble those parts should not be forced to be that weak, as well. (Same goes for overpowered stuff in core).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This puts the matter a bit too simply. There's more to it than this. </p><p>You have to devote some of your blade magic resources to the Diamond Mind discipline, and for a warblade that often means taking it as one of his two disciplines. (Not too great a hindrance, I give you that)</p><p></p><p>You also have to devote one of your manoeuvres to this. In order to be using the manoeuvre, you'll have to give up some other manoeuvre.</p><p></p><p>Also, you can't just use it every two rounds. You have to use it (and maybe another, like a strike, in the same round), and not use any other manoeuvres in the following round (since you need to spend your swift action regaining your manoeuvres, and are then forced to do a normal, regular, vanilla attack or waste a standard action practically doing nothing). </p><p></p><p>This means that from the 4+ manoeuvres you have prepared, you have to ignore at least half. </p><p>It also means that you have to do without your manoeuvres half the time.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd say there's quite a bit of difference between adhering to all these restrictions and just getting a feat that can be used every other round without any restrictions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kae'Yoss, post: 3540119, member: 4134"] Yes, that it should, but the core material has to be balanced with itself. If the core material has parts that are just weak, supplements that resemble those parts should not be forced to be that weak, as well. (Same goes for overpowered stuff in core). This puts the matter a bit too simply. There's more to it than this. You have to devote some of your blade magic resources to the Diamond Mind discipline, and for a warblade that often means taking it as one of his two disciplines. (Not too great a hindrance, I give you that) You also have to devote one of your manoeuvres to this. In order to be using the manoeuvre, you'll have to give up some other manoeuvre. Also, you can't just use it every two rounds. You have to use it (and maybe another, like a strike, in the same round), and not use any other manoeuvres in the following round (since you need to spend your swift action regaining your manoeuvres, and are then forced to do a normal, regular, vanilla attack or waste a standard action practically doing nothing). This means that from the 4+ manoeuvres you have prepared, you have to ignore at least half. It also means that you have to do without your manoeuvres half the time. I'd say there's quite a bit of difference between adhering to all these restrictions and just getting a feat that can be used every other round without any restrictions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warblade maneuvers
Top