Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mort" data-source="post: 7433393" data-attributes="member: 762">To add to my prior reply:Because your DM is already giving you one of the primary benefits of Warcaster for free - mechanically resilient seems much stronger:The +1 to con is essentially the same as just taking an ASI (thanks to the 13 con);The +2 to saves (which goes up as you level) in addition, so your COn save goes from +1 to +4 (thanks again to the Con bump) is basically a deal breaker right there.BUT - as a personal preference (since you ARE asking for opinions):Warcaster, to me, is the more active feat and therefore more fun.With Resilient - you write down the Con bump and the fact that you are now proficient in con - add the relevant bonuses (which are significant) and move on. With Warcaster - everytime you make an AoO and the enemy suffers from booming blade your character did that, it adds to the story. Everytime you roll 2d20 instead of 1 on a Con save - you see the effects. Seems more character defining.It's kind of silly (because, again, resilient's effects are tangible, if passive) but it just seems more fun to me.Just a thought.</blockquote>