Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DMZ2112" data-source="post: 7658070" data-attributes="member: 78752">I haven't given up hope yet, but the more time that passes (and the more iconic elements of other worlds get shoehorned into FR) the more worried I become that, &quot;the core setting of D&amp;D5 is the multiverse,&quot; is another way of saying, &quot;your only limits are those of your imagination.&quot;Yeah, well, that and $5 will buy me a chai at Starbucks.I don't want to see settings rehashed in D&amp;D5 for the sake of rehashing them, but I also don't want to see new material only coming out for FR.&nbsp; And I'm a recent FR convert!&nbsp; If the setting is the multiverse, then let the published content reflect that.I'm a big fan of the proposal, but now I want something tangible I can continue to believe in.&nbsp; Moving the Temple of Elemental Evil to the Sword Coast -- even if it's &quot;not the same temple&quot; -- is a tough thing to justify with their previous statements.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DMZ2112, post: 7658070, member: 78752"] I haven't given up hope yet, but the more time that passes (and the more iconic elements of other worlds get shoehorned into FR) the more worried I become that, "the core setting of D&D5 is the multiverse," is another way of saying, "your only limits are those of your imagination." Yeah, well, that and $5 will buy me a chai at Starbucks. I don't want to see settings rehashed in D&D5 for the sake of rehashing them, but I also don't want to see new material only coming out for FR. And I'm a recent FR convert! If the setting is the multiverse, then let the published content reflect that. I'm a big fan of the proposal, but now I want something tangible I can continue to believe in. Moving the Temple of Elemental Evil to the Sword Coast -- even if it's "not the same temple" -- is a tough thing to justify with their previous statements. [/QUOTE]

Verification