Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warforged: Like them or loathe them?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 3766454" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>I'll be competely shocked if they are in. </p><p>There have been comments in multiple locations about playtests and it is not needed that every detail be repeated every time. </p><p></p><p>It seems very reasonable to guess that player A didn't see anything to match his warforged and took a swing at re-building it but player B was satisified with just changing his illumian over.</p><p></p><p>To assume that every player was forced into the same mold seems vastly less reasonable.</p><p></p><p>There was somewhere else where they mentioned that their group's first try at a worforged fell quite short of balanced. And the tone of the statements were clearly, to me, joking it off as "their mistake, no harm no foul" in a way that distanced the "not balanced" concept from official in the works 4E stuff.</p><p></p><p>Besides, putting warforged in would have fairly significant consequences. It is easy to say that a group can just ignore them. And they can. But WotC also wants to sell as much stuff as they possibly can. If warforged are in the PH1 then every DDI module will be forced to assume that a warforged is just as likely a party member as a dwarf. And if warforged are "core core" then they should also appear as npcs. And if the first fighter book has to spend page count of warforged feats and the 4E equivalent of warforged PClasses, then the value of the book will be reduced for a lot of people.</p><p></p><p>It just doesn't make sense. Particularly if you consider that they can pretty much just walk into having their cake and eating it too. Leave the original core basically true to the "classic" fantasy archetypes and start supporting 4E Eberron quickly on its heels. It sounds like it may be months to a year before the 4E core Eb book is out, but I do completely agree with you that on line support for Eberron will appear much earlier than that. </p><p></p><p>WotC will be in a hurry to support their Eberron fans. But they are not going to alienate their "no robots* please" audience to do it. Especially since they can so easily please both groups.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>* - I'm not calling them robots, I'm refering to a group.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 3766454, member: 957"] I'll be competely shocked if they are in. There have been comments in multiple locations about playtests and it is not needed that every detail be repeated every time. It seems very reasonable to guess that player A didn't see anything to match his warforged and took a swing at re-building it but player B was satisified with just changing his illumian over. To assume that every player was forced into the same mold seems vastly less reasonable. There was somewhere else where they mentioned that their group's first try at a worforged fell quite short of balanced. And the tone of the statements were clearly, to me, joking it off as "their mistake, no harm no foul" in a way that distanced the "not balanced" concept from official in the works 4E stuff. Besides, putting warforged in would have fairly significant consequences. It is easy to say that a group can just ignore them. And they can. But WotC also wants to sell as much stuff as they possibly can. If warforged are in the PH1 then every DDI module will be forced to assume that a warforged is just as likely a party member as a dwarf. And if warforged are "core core" then they should also appear as npcs. And if the first fighter book has to spend page count of warforged feats and the 4E equivalent of warforged PClasses, then the value of the book will be reduced for a lot of people. It just doesn't make sense. Particularly if you consider that they can pretty much just walk into having their cake and eating it too. Leave the original core basically true to the "classic" fantasy archetypes and start supporting 4E Eberron quickly on its heels. It sounds like it may be months to a year before the 4E core Eb book is out, but I do completely agree with you that on line support for Eberron will appear much earlier than that. WotC will be in a hurry to support their Eberron fans. But they are not going to alienate their "no robots* please" audience to do it. Especially since they can so easily please both groups. * - I'm not calling them robots, I'm refering to a group. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warforged: Like them or loathe them?
Top