Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Noctem" data-source="post: 6772989" data-attributes="member: 6801315">Ok... and why does it matter if it doesn't need the language if we get a no answer?&nbsp; Nothing changes as a result, this fact isn't even important at that point.&nbsp; I don't understand why you think this is important or a reason why the question isn't valid?Potential future spells not yet written... are also irrelevant to this discussion.&nbsp; However I would say that the question is actually very much relevant to our understanding of them since if the answer is YES, then that means that future spells will ALSO have to specify that their attacks are resolved simultaneously.&nbsp; Which again goes to reinforce the tweet from JC from earlier in the thread which I just linked.&nbsp; Which again is why MM actually needs to say that.&nbsp; If the answer is no, it also would help us understand because of the points under No I listed in my previous post.I mean it sounds to me like you're just grasping at straws here...&nbsp; Nothing you just posted is actually an issue or means that the question isn't a good one.&nbsp; Are you just saying it's not a good one for the sake of doing so?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Noctem, post: 6772989, member: 6801315"] Ok... and why does it matter if it doesn't need the language if we get a no answer? Nothing changes as a result, this fact isn't even important at that point. I don't understand why you think this is important or a reason why the question isn't valid? Potential future spells not yet written... are also irrelevant to this discussion. However I would say that the question is actually very much relevant to our understanding of them since if the answer is YES, then that means that future spells will ALSO have to specify that their attacks are resolved simultaneously. Which again goes to reinforce the tweet from JC from earlier in the thread which I just linked. Which again is why MM actually needs to say that. If the answer is no, it also would help us understand because of the points under No I listed in my previous post. I mean it sounds to me like you're just grasping at straws here... Nothing you just posted is actually an issue or means that the question isn't a good one. Are you just saying it's not a good one for the sake of doing so? [/QUOTE]

Verification