Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 6776502" data-attributes="member: 16814">Nope, completely mean to be pedantic.  Noctem is refusing to accept the dictionary definition of immediately, instead insisting that it might, in this case, without any indication that would be so, might instead mean something different.  Noctem is insisting that other people have to ask his question, which they've clearly said they think isn't useful and why that is so, because it's the only way for other people to stop disagreeing with him.  Noctem has been repeatedly insulting and dismissive of people that make reasoned arguments that disagree with his.  And I'm being called out as pedantic while he's getting a pass as 'a little dismissive?' Or are you saying that I didn't also show a lot of patience for Noctum while he seems intent on misconstruing things that I've taken the time to type out meticulously?  Every single time I've listed the rules and assumptions and outcomes, he's ignored it and returned to insisting either 'immediately doesn't mean immediately' or 'we'll just have to wait for Crawford.'  Or is it that you think my disagreement with his is over anything but the ability for RAs to interrupt actions after their trigger has occurred?  If you agree with Noctem, please, oh very please, explain the logic there, because I'm not getting anything but intransigence from Noctem.</blockquote>