Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 6776807" data-attributes="member: 16814">Nope.&nbsp; I agreed pretty quickly with what Crawford said.&nbsp; I ran with than and explored the ramifications, toying with the dispel idea before discarding it (and arguing with Arial about it).&nbsp; My main point of contention has been the bit about readied action timing, which, looking back, took something like 5 pages from my first question to when Noctem actually addressed it.&nbsp; In the meantime, he accused me of being in league with Ariel and since I thought like Ariel he wouldn't talk to me.&nbsp; This was after I had just argued with Ariel's POV, so... yeah.&nbsp; I felt misconstrued by Noctem quite often. And I remained perfectly respectful, even patient, though being thoroughly dismissed and trivialized for asking about issues unresolved (and still unresolved).&nbsp; I think it's a good point to resolve whether or not, since EB is sequential, if you can have an RA go off in between blasts.&nbsp; I can see multiple arguments for and against, but I don't know what Noctem's argument is aside from 'no, you can't, because you can't interrupt actions.'&nbsp; I've been trying to find out where he gets that from for, oh, 30 pages now.This confuses me.&nbsp; Why does Noctem get your benefit of the doubt but I don't?Heck, back on page 10 I was still very polite.&nbsp; Wasn't until after 20 I started getting snippy.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 6776807, member: 16814"] Nope. I agreed pretty quickly with what Crawford said. I ran with than and explored the ramifications, toying with the dispel idea before discarding it (and arguing with Arial about it). My main point of contention has been the bit about readied action timing, which, looking back, took something like 5 pages from my first question to when Noctem actually addressed it. In the meantime, he accused me of being in league with Ariel and since I thought like Ariel he wouldn't talk to me. This was after I had just argued with Ariel's POV, so... yeah. I felt misconstrued by Noctem quite often. And I remained perfectly respectful, even patient, though being thoroughly dismissed and trivialized for asking about issues unresolved (and still unresolved). I think it's a good point to resolve whether or not, since EB is sequential, if you can have an RA go off in between blasts. I can see multiple arguments for and against, but I don't know what Noctem's argument is aside from 'no, you can't, because you can't interrupt actions.' I've been trying to find out where he gets that from for, oh, 30 pages now. This confuses me. Why does Noctem get your benefit of the doubt but I don't? Heck, back on page 10 I was still very polite. Wasn't until after 20 I started getting snippy. [/QUOTE]

Verification