Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlock and Repelling Blast
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ryan92084" data-source="post: 6793242" data-attributes="member: 6802559"><p>Just playing devil's advocate here but if instant only means less than a turn and ready actions can go between the spell's beams/rays then the dispel can hit within that less than one turn instant.</p><p></p><p>Honestly though nothing posted here since the tweet clarification is new. There are a myriad of potential reasons to not allow dispel to work. </p><p></p><p>Pick one or any combination of</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The instantaneous duration says so</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The devs say so</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The beams/rays aren't a valid target for dispel</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Instant means several things besides the entire description must fit within a time approaching nil</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">If the trigger is a magical attack the dispel goes between beams leaving no target</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The trigger timing to have a beam mid streak(after attack but before it lands) is too tight and if allowed would make any spell with an invented travel time subject to a readied dispel</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"> other that i forgot</li> </ol><p></p><p>And only one to let it work</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"> Instant doesn't mean a time approaching nil and refers to the whole description so the devs are wrong and sequential beams are subject to dispel. Otherwise instant must mean a time approaching nil and refers to the whole description so the devs are wrong and the attack is simultaneous</li> </ol><p></p><p>Which was originally Arial's argument for the targeting must be simultaneous/before the attacks are rolled and how the whole dispel ready action discussion came about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ryan92084, post: 6793242, member: 6802559"] Just playing devil's advocate here but if instant only means less than a turn and ready actions can go between the spell's beams/rays then the dispel can hit within that less than one turn instant. Honestly though nothing posted here since the tweet clarification is new. There are a myriad of potential reasons to not allow dispel to work. Pick one or any combination of [LIST=1] [*]The instantaneous duration says so [*]The devs say so [*]The beams/rays aren't a valid target for dispel [*]Instant means several things besides the entire description must fit within a time approaching nil [*]If the trigger is a magical attack the dispel goes between beams leaving no target [*]The trigger timing to have a beam mid streak(after attack but before it lands) is too tight and if allowed would make any spell with an invented travel time subject to a readied dispel [*] other that i forgot [/LIST] And only one to let it work [LIST=1] [*] Instant doesn't mean a time approaching nil and refers to the whole description so the devs are wrong and sequential beams are subject to dispel. Otherwise instant must mean a time approaching nil and refers to the whole description so the devs are wrong and the attack is simultaneous [/LIST] Which was originally Arial's argument for the targeting must be simultaneous/before the attacks are rolled and how the whole dispel ready action discussion came about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlock and Repelling Blast
Top