Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlock and Repelling Blast
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 6802404" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>My entire argument about verbal components is <em>not</em> based on any 'assumption' that all components must be completed before the effects occur, but is based on the RAW:-</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Imagine that you start to cast a spell with VS components. What this means, RAW, is that you begin chanting the 'particular combination of sounds', with 'specific pitch and resonance', and also use at least one hand to 'perform these gestures'.</p><p></p><p>This doesn't take zero time in the world; you begin chanting and gesturing, go through the specific words and actions for that spell, and then complete them.</p><p></p><p>Imagine that you are half-way through this process when readied spells that cause you to be within a bubble of magical silence and that paralyse you cause you to fail to complete either the verbal or somatic component. Does the spell effect begin?</p><p></p><p>RAW, no, it absolutely cannot begin. You have failed to provide the particular combination of sounds, because that particular combination would be a different combination if there were some words missing. You have failed to provide the somatic component, because you haven't performed the required set of gestures.</p><p></p><p>If <em>some</em> of a spell's effect were to appear before the casting was complete, then some of the effect would occur <em>even though you never provided the required verbal and somatic components!</em> This is not legal by the RAW.</p><p></p><p>The casting process must be complete before the spell effect begins. This is not a mere assumption, but the consequence of the Rules As Written.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 6802404, member: 6799649"] My entire argument about verbal components is [i]not[/i] based on any 'assumption' that all components must be completed before the effects occur, but is based on the RAW:- Imagine that you start to cast a spell with VS components. What this means, RAW, is that you begin chanting the 'particular combination of sounds', with 'specific pitch and resonance', and also use at least one hand to 'perform these gestures'. This doesn't take zero time in the world; you begin chanting and gesturing, go through the specific words and actions for that spell, and then complete them. Imagine that you are half-way through this process when readied spells that cause you to be within a bubble of magical silence and that paralyse you cause you to fail to complete either the verbal or somatic component. Does the spell effect begin? RAW, no, it absolutely cannot begin. You have failed to provide the particular combination of sounds, because that particular combination would be a different combination if there were some words missing. You have failed to provide the somatic component, because you haven't performed the required set of gestures. If [i]some[/i] of a spell's effect were to appear before the casting was complete, then some of the effect would occur [i]even though you never provided the required verbal and somatic components![/i] This is not legal by the RAW. The casting process must be complete before the spell effect begins. This is not a mere assumption, but the consequence of the Rules As Written. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlock and Repelling Blast
Top