Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 7037258" data-attributes="member: 59816">It seems that some people equate "not RAW" with "bad" and therefore have a hard time accepting that they have made a "not RAW ruling".Many of us share the same, very reasonable rulings, but that doesn't make them RAW unless it is ACTUALLY WRITTEN. It's what the W stands for.There is no RAW on the subject of this thread. It just isn't there. It would probably be more effective to discuss what a reasonable ruling would be, but there's clearly not likely to be a consensus.I've never had it come up - actually, that's not true - I had one player try to do it once a long time ago, after he read it online. I hadn't heard of it before, and thought it was an abuse of a corner case and ruled against it as a knee-jerk reaction. Having now had more time to think on it, I would probably allow it to see what it was like - but I've never had a Warlock player try it again. I don't usually play with optimizers, even in AL.At any rate I've gone back and forth on my feelings on the subject the whole time I read this thread. I agree, at least in part, with nearly every post here.Sent from my LG-D852 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></blockquote>