Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlock Mechanics - The best representation of modern fantasy archetypes in Dnd
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 8839255" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>You are suggesting changes to the game - you want changes that will affect the wider D&D community.</p><p></p><p>In short you literally want to remove them <em>as classes</em> from the game. You want to remove what people like and play from the game and utterly shred the class variety of the most popular spellcasting class because your tiny group differs from the mainstream.</p><p></p><p>So thank you for proving my point.</p><p></p><p>And maybe you should realise that you shouldn't suggest changes to D&D as a whole based on your atypical group.</p><p></p><p>If I were to have my way then I'd demote wizard to a subclass of sorcerer that uses intelligence for spellcasting - the sorcerers that gain their spells from the study of books.</p><p></p><p>It represents a lot more of it than your table.</p><p></p><p>No one said it didn't. However it is just a small minority (as seen by the explosive growth of D&D in recent years).</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile the wizard is a long rest class with arcane spells that it prepares. It is <em>utterly redundant</em> in a game that also has sorcerers, clerics, full caster bards, and warlocks.</p><p></p><p>If we're taking classes out for being meh, take the redundant ones out first. Ditch the wizard. You might not personally like invocations - but people do and no other class has them. You might find the patrons very meh - but no other class has something that comes close. And the wizard subclasses ("I'm a book caster who's slightly better at a few spells") might be better than the pre-4e wizard subclasses (I can cast extra spells but they are exactly the same spells as any other wizard other than the ones I can't cast) but are still all boring.</p><p></p><p>But instead what you want downgraded from the status of a full class is simultaneously:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The most popular spellcasting class according to the best data we have available</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The single class with the most interesting levelling experience</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The single class with the most mechanically varied characters (thanks to the Invocations and the Pact Boon)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The class that works least like the other classes (the <em>only</em> short rest spellcasting class)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Probably the spellcasting class with the greatest variety in their subclasses</li> </ul><p>And somehow you want to downgrade this into a subclass.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 8839255, member: 87792"] You are suggesting changes to the game - you want changes that will affect the wider D&D community. In short you literally want to remove them [I]as classes[/I] from the game. You want to remove what people like and play from the game and utterly shred the class variety of the most popular spellcasting class because your tiny group differs from the mainstream. So thank you for proving my point. And maybe you should realise that you shouldn't suggest changes to D&D as a whole based on your atypical group. If I were to have my way then I'd demote wizard to a subclass of sorcerer that uses intelligence for spellcasting - the sorcerers that gain their spells from the study of books. It represents a lot more of it than your table. No one said it didn't. However it is just a small minority (as seen by the explosive growth of D&D in recent years). Meanwhile the wizard is a long rest class with arcane spells that it prepares. It is [I]utterly redundant[/I] in a game that also has sorcerers, clerics, full caster bards, and warlocks. If we're taking classes out for being meh, take the redundant ones out first. Ditch the wizard. You might not personally like invocations - but people do and no other class has them. You might find the patrons very meh - but no other class has something that comes close. And the wizard subclasses ("I'm a book caster who's slightly better at a few spells") might be better than the pre-4e wizard subclasses (I can cast extra spells but they are exactly the same spells as any other wizard other than the ones I can't cast) but are still all boring. But instead what you want downgraded from the status of a full class is simultaneously: [LIST] [*]The most popular spellcasting class according to the best data we have available [*]The single class with the most interesting levelling experience [*]The single class with the most mechanically varied characters (thanks to the Invocations and the Pact Boon) [*]The class that works least like the other classes (the [I]only[/I] short rest spellcasting class) [*]Probably the spellcasting class with the greatest variety in their subclasses [/LIST] And somehow you want to downgrade this into a subclass. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlock Mechanics - The best representation of modern fantasy archetypes in Dnd
Top