Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warlock Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tzarevitch" data-source="post: 1885629" data-attributes="member: 1792"><p>Could someone help me with this? If a warlock's Eldrich Blast is a spell-like ability and therefore takes a standard action to activate, and the invocations also take a standard action to activate (they are spell-like and the warlock entry states they take a standard action), precisely how is the warlock supposed to use the invocations that modify the eldrich blast? That is a standard action too many unless you use the Quicken Spell-like ability feat. I have re-read the text for the warlock class and the invocations and I am not clear on how this works. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> </p><p></p><p>Here are the possibilities as I see them:</p><p>1. The invocations and the eldrich blast are each a standard action therefore you can really only fire a modified eldrich blast every other round (1 round to invoke the invocation, 1 round to actually fire the blast). The problem I have found with this interpretation is that most of the invocations that modify the blast do not have a duration, so it is unclear if you can even "hold the charge" until the next round to load it onto the blast. Also, the warlock really only has one good trick (the eldrich blast and its modifications) and reducing it to every other round seems kind of harsh. </p><p></p><p>2. The invocations and the eldrich blast are each a standard action but you are EXPECTED to use Quicken Spell-like ability to get past this problem. This however does reign in the power of the warlock because while he can use his abilities at will for the most part, he can only make them really powerful 3x (as limited by quicken spell-like ability). It also begs the question that if this was intended, why it wasn't just added as a class feature instead of forcing the warlock to take feats to do it. </p><p></p><p>3. Somehow invoking the invocation and using the eldrich blast is the same standard action. I can't find anything that says that this is correct. This also seems a bit powerful, but the examples that CA uses of stacking an invocation on an eldrich blast don't mention either of the above 2 possibilities. Unfortunately, they don't clearly mention this one either. </p><p></p><p>I am sorry if someone already asked this question but I couldn't find an answer in my quick search of the many warlock related threads. </p><p></p><p>Tzarevitch</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tzarevitch, post: 1885629, member: 1792"] Could someone help me with this? If a warlock's Eldrich Blast is a spell-like ability and therefore takes a standard action to activate, and the invocations also take a standard action to activate (they are spell-like and the warlock entry states they take a standard action), precisely how is the warlock supposed to use the invocations that modify the eldrich blast? That is a standard action too many unless you use the Quicken Spell-like ability feat. I have re-read the text for the warlock class and the invocations and I am not clear on how this works. :confused: Here are the possibilities as I see them: 1. The invocations and the eldrich blast are each a standard action therefore you can really only fire a modified eldrich blast every other round (1 round to invoke the invocation, 1 round to actually fire the blast). The problem I have found with this interpretation is that most of the invocations that modify the blast do not have a duration, so it is unclear if you can even "hold the charge" until the next round to load it onto the blast. Also, the warlock really only has one good trick (the eldrich blast and its modifications) and reducing it to every other round seems kind of harsh. 2. The invocations and the eldrich blast are each a standard action but you are EXPECTED to use Quicken Spell-like ability to get past this problem. This however does reign in the power of the warlock because while he can use his abilities at will for the most part, he can only make them really powerful 3x (as limited by quicken spell-like ability). It also begs the question that if this was intended, why it wasn't just added as a class feature instead of forcing the warlock to take feats to do it. 3. Somehow invoking the invocation and using the eldrich blast is the same standard action. I can't find anything that says that this is correct. This also seems a bit powerful, but the examples that CA uses of stacking an invocation on an eldrich blast don't mention either of the above 2 possibilities. Unfortunately, they don't clearly mention this one either. I am sorry if someone already asked this question but I couldn't find an answer in my quick search of the many warlock related threads. Tzarevitch [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warlock Question
Top