Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warlock Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ahnehnois" data-source="post: 6295305" data-attributes="member: 17106"><p>Your text is black, which for most of us means that it displays on a black background and therefore is illegible (I had to highlight it to read it). Something people sometimes do accidentally here at ENW; just an FYI.</p><p></p><p>Also, since you probably can't post links yet, this is the <a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/3rd-party-classes/adamant-entertainment/warlock" target="_blank">link</a>.</p><p></p><p>***</p><p></p><p>To the actual question, a supernatural (Su) ability lacks components and has very few requirements. According to the<a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/gamemastering/special-abilities#TOC-Supernatural-Abilities-Su-" target="_blank"> special ability text</a>, a Su ability does not provoke attacks of opportunity. Since there are no somatic or verbal components, it is not prohibited by grapple either.</p><p></p><p>Paralysis is a thornier issue and I am not entirely sure what the ruling is on that. I am not sure that there is an official ruling; none was evident to me when I checked quickly. The <a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/gamemastering/conditions#TOC-Paralyzed" target="_blank">paralysis text</a> says that you can take purely mental actions; no physical element is specified under Su abilities or these abilities in particular, so AFAICT the answer is that you can use them while paralyzed. A GM would hardly be unreasonable in reversing that and saying that some modicum of physical action is required.</p><p></p><p>No. The relevant text on Dimensional Agility says "After using abundant step or casting dimension door". Using the shift power is like dimension door, but it is not <em>casting</em> dimension door. That's why they felt the need to list abundant step specifically, even though it is also based off of the spell. The text was probably written this way to prevent these kinds of combinations as they can lead to unforeseen consequences, but if you wanted to houserule it back in you certainly could.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ahnehnois, post: 6295305, member: 17106"] Your text is black, which for most of us means that it displays on a black background and therefore is illegible (I had to highlight it to read it). Something people sometimes do accidentally here at ENW; just an FYI. Also, since you probably can't post links yet, this is the [URL="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/3rd-party-classes/adamant-entertainment/warlock"]link[/URL]. *** To the actual question, a supernatural (Su) ability lacks components and has very few requirements. According to the[URL="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/gamemastering/special-abilities#TOC-Supernatural-Abilities-Su-"] special ability text[/URL], a Su ability does not provoke attacks of opportunity. Since there are no somatic or verbal components, it is not prohibited by grapple either. Paralysis is a thornier issue and I am not entirely sure what the ruling is on that. I am not sure that there is an official ruling; none was evident to me when I checked quickly. The [URL="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/gamemastering/conditions#TOC-Paralyzed"]paralysis text[/URL] says that you can take purely mental actions; no physical element is specified under Su abilities or these abilities in particular, so AFAICT the answer is that you can use them while paralyzed. A GM would hardly be unreasonable in reversing that and saying that some modicum of physical action is required. No. The relevant text on Dimensional Agility says "After using abundant step or casting dimension door". Using the shift power is like dimension door, but it is not [I]casting[/I] dimension door. That's why they felt the need to list abundant step specifically, even though it is also based off of the spell. The text was probably written this way to prevent these kinds of combinations as they can lead to unforeseen consequences, but if you wanted to houserule it back in you certainly could. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warlock Questions
Top