Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warlocks = evil?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 3935582" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>I don't think celestial pacts are a good idea for the warlock class.</p><p></p><p>They're probably a good idea in general, I just don't think they're a good idea for the warlock class. It may be too far apart in theme to easily slot into the basic chassis of the warlock class.</p><p></p><p>I think of character classes like a vehicle chassis. Feats, skills, choosable abilities, those are the extras. Sometimes its easy to modify a particular class in a particular way. Take Fighters in 3e. If I want to make a fighter who is palpably a good guy, I can do it. If I want to make a fighter who gives people the creeps and is palpably a bad guy, I can do that too.</p><p></p><p>But sometimes its not that easy. Sometimes the theme of the class goes further than skin deep. Sometimes giving a new set of options with which to customize your chassis doesn't create what you're looking for, because the underlying chassis is too specific to something you don't want.</p><p></p><p>Consider most Evil Paladin classes that basically just swap the words "good" and "evil" in the core 3e paladin class. Sure, some of them are functional. But a lot of them would be much better if they went ahead and started fresh, and designed a class for Paladins of Evil from the ground up, with their own vision, rather than with blinders from looking at the core Paladin too long.</p><p></p><p>I think that maybe adding an angelic pact option to warlocks might be that sort of mistake. If the theme to warlocks goes as deep as I think it does, a "pact with angels" choice may be too different from what we've got so far.</p><p></p><p>I'd be excited for a class that DID make pacts with angels. I've been wanting my Magical Anime Girl class for a long, long time. And a character who gains the ability to fly and shoot light from her hands after being blessed by an angel is EXACTLY what I'm looking for. I just suspect that the class which is constructed in a manner similar to either the 3e Warlock, the 3e Binder, or both, won't accept that customization option well.</p><p></p><p>I can't know for sure without seeing the class itself. But a new class might be the best choice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 3935582, member: 40961"] I don't think celestial pacts are a good idea for the warlock class. They're probably a good idea in general, I just don't think they're a good idea for the warlock class. It may be too far apart in theme to easily slot into the basic chassis of the warlock class. I think of character classes like a vehicle chassis. Feats, skills, choosable abilities, those are the extras. Sometimes its easy to modify a particular class in a particular way. Take Fighters in 3e. If I want to make a fighter who is palpably a good guy, I can do it. If I want to make a fighter who gives people the creeps and is palpably a bad guy, I can do that too. But sometimes its not that easy. Sometimes the theme of the class goes further than skin deep. Sometimes giving a new set of options with which to customize your chassis doesn't create what you're looking for, because the underlying chassis is too specific to something you don't want. Consider most Evil Paladin classes that basically just swap the words "good" and "evil" in the core 3e paladin class. Sure, some of them are functional. But a lot of them would be much better if they went ahead and started fresh, and designed a class for Paladins of Evil from the ground up, with their own vision, rather than with blinders from looking at the core Paladin too long. I think that maybe adding an angelic pact option to warlocks might be that sort of mistake. If the theme to warlocks goes as deep as I think it does, a "pact with angels" choice may be too different from what we've got so far. I'd be excited for a class that DID make pacts with angels. I've been wanting my Magical Anime Girl class for a long, long time. And a character who gains the ability to fly and shoot light from her hands after being blessed by an angel is EXACTLY what I'm looking for. I just suspect that the class which is constructed in a manner similar to either the 3e Warlock, the 3e Binder, or both, won't accept that customization option well. I can't know for sure without seeing the class itself. But a new class might be the best choice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warlocks = evil?
Top