Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ClaytonCross" data-source="post: 7333939" data-attributes="member: 6880599">Not only that but because of the wording if you were cross classed into any of the classes that give you multi-attack you could use your the first for you and the second for the familiar, or if you were 7 levels in eldritch knight you could use war magic to cast a cantrip then have your familiar attack with the bonus action attack that provides although War Clerics can attack as a bonus action for a number of times equal to there wisdom modifier per long rest from level 1 which would be the cheapest buy and allows you to keep your hands free. Despite this being the text (and I checked) I would ask your GM about it prior to trying to use it. It should be fine per RAW but I could see it classified as "rule layering" if you catch a GM off guard where if they had time to look it up they could ... clarify ...their interpretation with a house rule or maybe look at how grappling works on "attach actions" and come to terms with it before being put on the spot.Edit: So I read some of the posts and then I read the relevant wording all of these and I was wrong about Eldritch Knight War magic the rest all seem correct to me. I will put the quotes in a new post below.</blockquote>