Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9858779" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>Yea it's bad design built primarily so it caters to munchkinism under an umbrella of "RoLePlAyInG" that shields it from the gm ever leaning in or calling bs. All of that was before Crawford gleefully leaned in talking about how it was by intended design that the warlock patron couldn't expect or deny anything from the warlock.</p><p></p><p>I once had a table of players who were going off on a quest to clear out a ancient temple/tomb/fortress kinda thing so one of the players could do a thing there using the natural energy present (<em>iirc it involved a wizard crafting a magic weapon for the party fighter</em>). Wanting to involve more players by hooking in their PCs when I was building it I decided that it would be occupied by a group of fey of a different faction than the fey pact warlock in the party figuring that the self proclaimed roleplayers who loved reminding us would have <em>some</em> reaction to finding out it was get occupied.</p><p></p><p>When the players were given the quest it was made explicitly clear that the temple was fet occupied... No reaction from the feylock player.</p><p></p><p>The players had something∆ to finish in town after finding out about the quest. When one of the other players brought up a few minutes later how it might be a problem that they should plan for the warlock player literally said "<em>no warlock doesn't work that way, my patron can't do anything to me even if it's their fey</em>".</p><p></p><p>When the gm responded with <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="‼️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/203c.png" title="Double exclamation mark :bangbang:" data-shortname=":bangbang:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="⁉️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/2049.png" title="Exclamation question mark :interrobang:" data-shortname=":interrobang:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />uhh... You are always invoking the "<em>I'm a RoLePlAyEr and</em>.." swear and really should reach out<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="‼️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/203c.png" title="Double exclamation mark :bangbang:" data-shortname=":bangbang:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="⁉️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/2049.png" title="Exclamation question mark :interrobang:" data-shortname=":interrobang:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />.the fey pact player said "ok I do that"§.</p><p></p><p> When the player was pushed to elaborate on how, there was an effort to brush it off with "the way I usually do when I need to reach out"§. One of the other players (cleric maybe?) at the table called BS on that for the gm and convinced the fey pact player that they need to engage in & describe some kinda ritual like that time their cleric did x</p><p>$thing. "Oh I guess I buy cake and leave it in the Forest, let's go"§. The fey pact PC was visited by a fey messenger and told story stuff about the temple they were told to dedicate to their mutual patron/ruler so it could be claimed by them and taken from the fey who were defiling it. Party goes through the whole temple slaughtering fey who try to verbally make it personal with an enemy representative and the other players are more involved in the banter than the fey pact PC's player. At no point did the warlock player take any act whatsoever to claim or dedicate the temple to their patron and they literally cited Crawford on the matter. Obviously whatever fet based series of adventures was jettisoned into the nearest dumpster fire but the campaign continued for a few months of weekly sessions but ultimately that was also one of the last groups I was willing to run 5e for, I very much doubt that I would allow warlocks at my table if that were to change </p><p></p><p>∆it wasn't relevant what the something was. iirc it was holiday related and I gave their PCs Christmas presents or something silly?</p><p></p><p>§ Word For Word Quote. No over the months of play at that point the player had not once attempted to reach out to the patron</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9858779, member: 93670"] Yea it's bad design built primarily so it caters to munchkinism under an umbrella of "RoLePlAyInG" that shields it from the gm ever leaning in or calling bs. All of that was before Crawford gleefully leaned in talking about how it was by intended design that the warlock patron couldn't expect or deny anything from the warlock. I once had a table of players who were going off on a quest to clear out a ancient temple/tomb/fortress kinda thing so one of the players could do a thing there using the natural energy present ([I]iirc it involved a wizard crafting a magic weapon for the party fighter[/I]). Wanting to involve more players by hooking in their PCs when I was building it I decided that it would be occupied by a group of fey of a different faction than the fey pact warlock in the party figuring that the self proclaimed roleplayers who loved reminding us would have [I]some[/I] reaction to finding out it was get occupied. When the players were given the quest it was made explicitly clear that the temple was fet occupied... No reaction from the feylock player. The players had something∆ to finish in town after finding out about the quest. When one of the other players brought up a few minutes later how it might be a problem that they should plan for the warlock player literally said "[I]no warlock doesn't work that way, my patron can't do anything to me even if it's their fey[/I]". When the gm responded with ‼️⁉️uhh... You are always invoking the "[I]I'm a RoLePlAyEr and[/I].." swear and really should reach out‼️⁉️.the fey pact player said "ok I do that"§. When the player was pushed to elaborate on how, there was an effort to brush it off with "the way I usually do when I need to reach out"§. One of the other players (cleric maybe?) at the table called BS on that for the gm and convinced the fey pact player that they need to engage in & describe some kinda ritual like that time their cleric did x $thing. "Oh I guess I buy cake and leave it in the Forest, let's go"§. The fey pact PC was visited by a fey messenger and told story stuff about the temple they were told to dedicate to their mutual patron/ruler so it could be claimed by them and taken from the fey who were defiling it. Party goes through the whole temple slaughtering fey who try to verbally make it personal with an enemy representative and the other players are more involved in the banter than the fey pact PC's player. At no point did the warlock player take any act whatsoever to claim or dedicate the temple to their patron and they literally cited Crawford on the matter. Obviously whatever fet based series of adventures was jettisoned into the nearest dumpster fire but the campaign continued for a few months of weekly sessions but ultimately that was also one of the last groups I was willing to run 5e for, I very much doubt that I would allow warlocks at my table if that were to change ∆it wasn't relevant what the something was. iirc it was holiday related and I gave their PCs Christmas presents or something silly? § Word For Word Quote. No over the months of play at that point the player had not once attempted to reach out to the patron [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities
Top