Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlock's Revealed in Livestream
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Falling Icicle" data-source="post: 6271083" data-attributes="member: 17077"><p>While I have no problem with warlocks being based on pacts, I would like to have the option to play a warlock whose ancestor made the pact, or who was marked by some supernatural force without his consent, cursed by a fey while in the crib, etc. I also think it's very important that warlocks, no matter what the nature of their pact, are not beholden to their patrons once the pact has been forged. If I wanted to be the devoted servant of some higher power, I'd play a cleric or paladin. Warlocks, IMO, should be those who make dangerous bargains with strange otherworldly beings, scholars who seek out terrible and forbidden secrets that would drive lesser minds mad, and cunning arcanists who pry into the cracks in the universe that the gods had thought they had safely sealed away.</p><p></p><p>Warlocks should rightly be feared, and should be able to turn against the very beings that were foolish enough to curse them with their power. They shouldn't be portrayed as gullible fools who were too incompetent to be a "real" wizard so they sold their soul away for whatever scraps of power they can beg out of some greater being. Why would anyone want to play that? I want to play a warlock that other people fear and respect because he's powerful and cunning enough to delve into dark secrets that most people don't dare touch, not someone deserving of pity because he was so pathetic that they only way he could get power was to go begging for it.</p><p></p><p>A wizard should talk about his warlock friend like this: "That guy? He's a warlock. In my pursuit of knowledge, I myself have often felt the temptation to go to the dark side, to delve into those secrets and to commune with those beings that the gods tried to keep locked away - and for good reason. Many who gain such insights go mad. But a true warlock is one who is strong enough of mind and soul to not only unlock such forbidden insights, but to master them. He is cunning enough to bargain with arch devils and arch fey and come out ahead. He is willing to do almost anything for power, no matter the perils. It is fair to say that I regard him with wary respect, and even a healthy dose of fear."</p><p></p><p>Not: "Oh that guy? He's a warlock. LOL. He didn't have what it took to be a real magician, so he sold the only thing he had that was of any value - his soul. What a noob."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Falling Icicle, post: 6271083, member: 17077"] While I have no problem with warlocks being based on pacts, I would like to have the option to play a warlock whose ancestor made the pact, or who was marked by some supernatural force without his consent, cursed by a fey while in the crib, etc. I also think it's very important that warlocks, no matter what the nature of their pact, are not beholden to their patrons once the pact has been forged. If I wanted to be the devoted servant of some higher power, I'd play a cleric or paladin. Warlocks, IMO, should be those who make dangerous bargains with strange otherworldly beings, scholars who seek out terrible and forbidden secrets that would drive lesser minds mad, and cunning arcanists who pry into the cracks in the universe that the gods had thought they had safely sealed away. Warlocks should rightly be feared, and should be able to turn against the very beings that were foolish enough to curse them with their power. They shouldn't be portrayed as gullible fools who were too incompetent to be a "real" wizard so they sold their soul away for whatever scraps of power they can beg out of some greater being. Why would anyone want to play that? I want to play a warlock that other people fear and respect because he's powerful and cunning enough to delve into dark secrets that most people don't dare touch, not someone deserving of pity because he was so pathetic that they only way he could get power was to go begging for it. A wizard should talk about his warlock friend like this: "That guy? He's a warlock. In my pursuit of knowledge, I myself have often felt the temptation to go to the dark side, to delve into those secrets and to commune with those beings that the gods tried to keep locked away - and for good reason. Many who gain such insights go mad. But a true warlock is one who is strong enough of mind and soul to not only unlock such forbidden insights, but to master them. He is cunning enough to bargain with arch devils and arch fey and come out ahead. He is willing to do almost anything for power, no matter the perils. It is fair to say that I regard him with wary respect, and even a healthy dose of fear." Not: "Oh that guy? He's a warlock. LOL. He didn't have what it took to be a real magician, so he sold the only thing he had that was of any value - his soul. What a noob." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Warlock's Revealed in Livestream
Top