Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 6825018" data-attributes="member: 996">All the more reason to avoid that appearance in the way you related his observations.Nod.&nbsp; I tend to see it more as a 5e Warlord design can't afford to be limited to what it did in 4e, since 5e has eschewed formal 'roles,' and 5e classes tend to have much greater flexibility &amp; variety of contributions, as well as far more resources.&nbsp; Between that and wide-open design space there's room for everything the Warlord did, and more, once it's adapted to 5e.&nbsp; Wolf Pack Tactics is a good example.&nbsp; In 5e some monsters have a similar-themed ability that grants Advantage very easily, for instance.&nbsp; And, similarly, if you look at what could be accomplished on a more abstract level with WPT, you could home in on setting up Advantage and allowing allies to Disengage as it's primary functions.&nbsp; Quite workable and potentially pretty cool.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 6825018, member: 996"] All the more reason to avoid that appearance in the way you related his observations. Nod. I tend to see it more as a 5e Warlord design can't afford to be [i]limited[/i] to what it did in 4e, since 5e has eschewed formal 'roles,' and 5e classes tend to have much greater flexibility & variety of contributions, as well as far more resources. Between that and wide-open design space there's room for everything the Warlord did, and more, once it's adapted to 5e. Wolf Pack Tactics is a good example. In 5e some monsters have a similar-themed ability that grants Advantage very easily, for instance. And, similarly, if you look at what could be accomplished on a more abstract level with WPT, you could home in on setting up Advantage and allowing allies to Disengage as it's primary functions. Quite workable and potentially pretty cool. [/QUOTE]

Verification