Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warlord: STR-primary, not so much...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cmbarona" data-source="post: 4630734" data-attributes="member: 71281"><p>Yup. The short answer: psychology uses tons of statistics in their research, so psychologists need to know statistics.</p><p> </p><p>The long answer:</p><p> </p><p>1) Psychology deals a lot with concepts called "hypothetical constructs." Take one of these constructs for example: let's say, inhibition. It's hypothetical because it can't be measured. You can measure a lot of things that point to it, however: how likely a person is to say a socially inappropriate comment before and after drinking alcohol, for example.</p><p> </p><p>2) Because of these hypothetical constructs, a lot of psychology research has to use statistics. There is no 100% in psychology, as there might be in some cases in other sciences. Because of this lack of 100%, we use statistics to measure the likelihood of a theory. There is only likelihood in psychology, not certainty.</p><p> </p><p>3) Because of this aspect of psychology, statistics is a bigger focus for us than for many other fields. Psychologists therefore have made their own mark on the field of statistics by sheer necessity. One of my friends was a statistics major, and he was surprised at just how much of statistics was not invented by strict mathemeticians, but by psychologists needing to design their studies. I have to take his word for it, since I only really studied the stuff I need for psychological research, but I do believe he's accurate in his assessment.</p><p> </p><p>By "statistically trained psychologist," I did mean for research purposes. Statistics should fuel the field's application of assessment and treatment. Say, for example, we need to research two things: is old treatment A for a phobia really better than new treatment B? We can only answer that question based on statistics.</p><p> </p><p>Sorry, this has been a long tangent. It's just a pet peeve of mine to hear people mock a concept based on how it sounds rather than ask what it means.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cmbarona, post: 4630734, member: 71281"] Yup. The short answer: psychology uses tons of statistics in their research, so psychologists need to know statistics. The long answer: 1) Psychology deals a lot with concepts called "hypothetical constructs." Take one of these constructs for example: let's say, inhibition. It's hypothetical because it can't be measured. You can measure a lot of things that point to it, however: how likely a person is to say a socially inappropriate comment before and after drinking alcohol, for example. 2) Because of these hypothetical constructs, a lot of psychology research has to use statistics. There is no 100% in psychology, as there might be in some cases in other sciences. Because of this lack of 100%, we use statistics to measure the likelihood of a theory. There is only likelihood in psychology, not certainty. 3) Because of this aspect of psychology, statistics is a bigger focus for us than for many other fields. Psychologists therefore have made their own mark on the field of statistics by sheer necessity. One of my friends was a statistics major, and he was surprised at just how much of statistics was not invented by strict mathemeticians, but by psychologists needing to design their studies. I have to take his word for it, since I only really studied the stuff I need for psychological research, but I do believe he's accurate in his assessment. By "statistically trained psychologist," I did mean for research purposes. Statistics should fuel the field's application of assessment and treatment. Say, for example, we need to research two things: is old treatment A for a phobia really better than new treatment B? We can only answer that question based on statistics. Sorry, this has been a long tangent. It's just a pet peeve of mine to hear people mock a concept based on how it sounds rather than ask what it means. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warlord: STR-primary, not so much...
Top