Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 6660215" data-attributes="member: 996">Well, one of the big ones, psionics, has just gotten a UA.&nbsp; So, well, you won't be hearing less complaining, but it'll be a different kind of complaining, at least...&nbsp;A lot of bad ideas do get floated, yes.&nbsp; Bad ideas are easy to come up with. &nbsp;To be fair, on this particular topic, there was no compromise:&nbsp; the warlord was excluded from the 5e PH, the only class to appear in a prior-ed PH1 to be so excluded.&nbsp; The warlord is already - at best - relegated to the option ghetto, those who hate it have exactly what they want, already, and it's unassailable.&nbsp; Even a fantastic version of the class, excluded as it would be from the Standard Rules, wouldn't be a fair 'compromise' compared to something decent being in the PH, to begin with.&nbsp; &nbsp;Working within the system is just fine, 5e is a very wide-open system, it's not like there are any consistent progressions (beyond proficiency, which, really, how could that be a problem?) or tight balancing factors to get hung up on.&nbsp;I've even offered on-topic ideas. Well, the problem with 4e was that it wasn't 2e, and 5e did do a great job fixing that problem.&nbsp; ;P</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 6660215, member: 996"] Well, one of the big ones, psionics, has just gotten a UA. So, well, you won't be hearing less complaining, but it'll be a different kind of complaining, at least... A lot of bad ideas do get floated, yes. Bad ideas are easy to come up with. To be fair, on this particular topic, there was no compromise: the warlord was excluded from the 5e PH, the only class to appear in a prior-ed PH1 to be so excluded. The warlord is already - at best - relegated to the option ghetto, those who hate it have exactly what they want, already, and it's unassailable. Even a fantastic version of the class, excluded as it would be from the Standard Rules, wouldn't be a fair 'compromise' compared to something decent being in the PH, to begin with. Working within the system is just fine, 5e is a very wide-open system, it's not like there are any consistent progressions (beyond proficiency, which, really, how could that be a problem?) or tight balancing factors to get hung up on. I've even offered on-topic ideas. Well, the problem with 4e was that it wasn't 2e, and 5e did do a great job fixing that problem. ;P [/QUOTE]

Verification