Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 6676049" data-attributes="member: 6689464">Ok, in this I believe I can afford to be not silent. When one adapts a class who should you focus on? the fans or the detractors? For example I think the sorcerer class was designed by a wizard player, too focused on making sure it didn't step on the wizard's toes, and the class suffered from it. The end result was a class that felt strong, but only because we were playing it wrong, and the errata has effectively nerfed it, now there is no reason to play a dragon sorcerer if favored soul/storm sorc are available. The same but more could go to the warlord. Who is goign to play the warlord? who wants the warlord? thee warlord players! Want to listen to haters so they can stomach being on the same table? of course! Will you compromise something essential to the fans to please the haters? No way!That was part of my reasoning when writing my version, I'm not the biggest 4e fan out there, but I like the edition. And I wasn't going to do a disservice to the class by going with a revisionist train of logic. HP makes sense anyway, as long as you don't pay too much attention to the strings holding everything together.</blockquote>