NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="epithet" data-source="post: 6676747" data-attributes="member: 6796566">Oh, I know what Healing Word is. I know, in fact, because it is a 5e spell. I wasn't familiar with Inspiring Word, because it's from 4e.I'm not interested in making a 4e Warlord class, because it seems like 4e already has one. I'm interested in a 5e class, and I play and DM in 5e games... so I'm qualified. You, on the other hand, seem like you're having problems discussing this issue without having flashbacks to 2009 and becoming defensive over imagined hostility to what seem to be your favorite edition and class.One thing I've noticed is that while you are consistently dismissive toward just about everything I have to say on this matter, you never actually provide anything to back up your dismissal. You say that the amount of healing I suggest is inadequate, but refuse to quantify what you want to see. You rail against my invalid criticisms, but can't be bothered to invalidate them.Since you seem to have these 2009 debates so fresh in your mind, why don't you favor us all with a few highlights, demonstrating why everything I have to say in this thread is without merit? Take your time, I'll be here.The truth is, Tony, that your efforts to drive me and others from this thread and this discussion prove that you are only interested in one thing: finding people who agree with you and your very particular concept of what a Warlord ought to be. Anyone who disagrees with you is spouting "rubbish." Anyone who suggests an alternative to your Shining Perfect Platonic Form of a Warlord (which you seem unwilling to actually describe with specificity) is being "counter-productive."There has been a lot of "edition war nonsense" in the past several pages of this thread, Tony. It's all been from you. And so, instead of exchanging ideas about a class we all might enjoy having in the 5th edition of D&D, we're instead talking about the asinine way you've turned this into an argument. You're out of line. If you don't agree with something I have to say, fine... express a contrary position and back it up. If all you have to say is "that's nonsense from 2009" then I can only interpret that as "I don't like what you are saying but I can't argue with your reasoning."</blockquote>

Verification