Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cyberen" data-source="post: 6144389" data-attributes="member: 69074">My sensibilities would be very hard to offend !I just think the OP uses a strawman argument (and call the strawman "Mearls") when it mistakenly assumes the absence of the warlord comes from :* hate for 4e* willingness to keep mundane characters from doing extraordinary actions* stubborness to consider HP as meat only.I don't share any of these opinions, yet I consider importing the warlord wholesale into Next would be a mistake, because it would take the game in a direction (namely : "you can't play without combat healing")  I, and apparently many other posters, would find inapropriate for an edition meant to support many playstyles. Some of us hope for ritual-only healing being a viable option.</blockquote>