Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Warp Drive is Real! (Or is it?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 6313943" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>The alcubierre drive seems theoretically possible, the biggest requirements were a large amount of negative mass (or energy, whatever?) to create the desired shape of spacetime (eg. contracing space in front, expanding behind you). I believe it was the Nasa scientists that leads the current project that found a solution that required less negative mass (e.g. the orignal was something in the area of Jupiter's mass, the new one around the mass of the Voyager probe). </p><p></p><p>I found a neat analogy for it: </p><p>The original theory required A million unicorns to propel a sled to FTL, the new one only requires one. That sounds a bit more feasible. Problem of courseis getting that unicorn. </p><p>The difference would be that unicorns very likely do not exist, for negative mass, we really don't know yet and it could go either way.</p><p>The current efforts seem to revolve around the Casimir effect that basically creates something that could be considered negative mass/energy. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I also remember that negative energy/mass was also a "thing" to do to create wormholes that could be stable. (Beware I am just a layman with an interest, Umbran probably knows more about this than me. I rely on lies for children, students and readers-of-popular-science-books.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But overall, considering how much this story floated on the web this week, I think this is basically advertisement for NASA and its research projects. Maybe to get more people interested in pursuing a science career, maybe to justify funding. I am okay with that. I just hope no one expects he'll be able to book a flight to Eta Eridani in a few years to visit Spock's grand-grand parents or something like that.</p><p></p><p></p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">Funny, I also remember a story about how the Alcubierre drive would also cause huge amounts of radiations due to all the particles collected during the FTL travel. Stopping the engine would release a giant, destructive wavefront.</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">It's interesting how the two basic FTL theories seem to have 2 common elements.</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">- Require negative energy/mass</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">- Cause huge radiation.</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 6313943, member: 710"] The alcubierre drive seems theoretically possible, the biggest requirements were a large amount of negative mass (or energy, whatever?) to create the desired shape of spacetime (eg. contracing space in front, expanding behind you). I believe it was the Nasa scientists that leads the current project that found a solution that required less negative mass (e.g. the orignal was something in the area of Jupiter's mass, the new one around the mass of the Voyager probe). I found a neat analogy for it: The original theory required A million unicorns to propel a sled to FTL, the new one only requires one. That sounds a bit more feasible. Problem of courseis getting that unicorn. The difference would be that unicorns very likely do not exist, for negative mass, we really don't know yet and it could go either way. The current efforts seem to revolve around the Casimir effect that basically creates something that could be considered negative mass/energy. I also remember that negative energy/mass was also a "thing" to do to create wormholes that could be stable. (Beware I am just a layman with an interest, Umbran probably knows more about this than me. I rely on lies for children, students and readers-of-popular-science-books.) But overall, considering how much this story floated on the web this week, I think this is basically advertisement for NASA and its research projects. Maybe to get more people interested in pursuing a science career, maybe to justify funding. I am okay with that. I just hope no one expects he'll be able to book a flight to Eta Eridani in a few years to visit Spock's grand-grand parents or something like that. [LEFT][COLOR=#000000] Funny, I also remember a story about how the Alcubierre drive would also cause huge amounts of radiations due to all the particles collected during the FTL travel. Stopping the engine would release a giant, destructive wavefront. It's interesting how the two basic FTL theories seem to have 2 common elements. - Require negative energy/mass - Cause huge radiation. [/COLOR][/LEFT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Warp Drive is Real! (Or is it?)
Top