Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
warpriest questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mal Malenkirk" data-source="post: 4645423" data-attributes="member: 834"><p>Only one mark per target. If the enemy was marked by the fighter and now the warpriest marks him, it would remove the fighter mark.</p><p></p><p>If the character is both a warpriest and a fighter and therefore has two different type of marks, I'd ask him to choose which is in effect.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You can only make one opportunity attack per enemy's turn so that is a given.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You read to much in a 'next time'. The target is marked for the encounter unless superseded or unless you makr someone else with this feature.</p><p></p><p>So yeah, next time he shifts. And the next after that. And the next. No need to 'reset'.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. A basic attack is just that; a STR attack vs AC with your weapon and nothing more.</p><p></p><p>It's what you do when you charge, for example.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>3 wasn't true</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you are also a fighter, than yes, I guess.</p><p></p><p>A reward for having inherited an encounter and daily power that requires Wisdom and an implement...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd say not. If you are included in the blast, you are included as a target. It shouldn't trigger the mark. </p><p></p><p>I agree that by the text you can split hair and claim otherwise, but that's how every mark work and I wouldn't let someone rule lawyer his way out of it. As a DM I'd just shurgged it off.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's fairly clear.</p><p></p><p>You get a blast 5 that does ongoing radiant (save ends).</p><p></p><p>As a secondary you can immediatelt do 5D10 + WIS against 1 creature taking ongoing radiant from that attack within 5 square.</p><p></p><p>On subsequent round, you can take a standard action to repeat that 5D10+WIS against a target suffering ongoing radiant from that initial blast.</p><p></p><p>You can keep it up as long as someone hasn't succeeded his saving throw and is still taking damage from the initial blast.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mal Malenkirk, post: 4645423, member: 834"] Only one mark per target. If the enemy was marked by the fighter and now the warpriest marks him, it would remove the fighter mark. If the character is both a warpriest and a fighter and therefore has two different type of marks, I'd ask him to choose which is in effect. You can only make one opportunity attack per enemy's turn so that is a given. You read to much in a 'next time'. The target is marked for the encounter unless superseded or unless you makr someone else with this feature. So yeah, next time he shifts. And the next after that. And the next. No need to 'reset'. No. A basic attack is just that; a STR attack vs AC with your weapon and nothing more. It's what you do when you charge, for example. 3 wasn't true If you are also a fighter, than yes, I guess. A reward for having inherited an encounter and daily power that requires Wisdom and an implement... I'd say not. If you are included in the blast, you are included as a target. It shouldn't trigger the mark. I agree that by the text you can split hair and claim otherwise, but that's how every mark work and I wouldn't let someone rule lawyer his way out of it. As a DM I'd just shurgged it off. It's fairly clear. You get a blast 5 that does ongoing radiant (save ends). As a secondary you can immediatelt do 5D10 + WIS against 1 creature taking ongoing radiant from that attack within 5 square. On subsequent round, you can take a standard action to repeat that 5D10+WIS against a target suffering ongoing radiant from that initial blast. You can keep it up as long as someone hasn't succeeded his saving throw and is still taking damage from the initial blast. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
warpriest questions
Top