Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warrior-Mage Prestige Classes: which are viable & which are not
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StGabe" data-source="post: 3395428" data-attributes="member: 49275"><p>FWIW, the character that is effectively a gestalt fighter/mage is the Abjurant Champion. As I stated, the classes that do at least slightly stagger the casting progression and/or the hit die are at least a start towards balance. The EK, for example, is far closer to balanced than the Champion although a quick comparison to other classes demonstrates that it's not nearly there.</p><p></p><p>It's all well and good to say "yeah but I just want to buff myself for combat". Ok, great. But you don't need level 9 spells for that and you really have no business having them with a BAB that is better than a rogue or a monks. All that's well and good, yet, you still do have those level 9 spells and the Wizard class was built with the lowest hit die and BAB for a reason -- the spells are *that* powerful.</p><p></p><p>On whether a 10/10 fighter/mage is as powerful as other classes or not, I'll grant you that some synergy is lost. However, such a combo is still quite effective. You don't have to have Wish. Such a character still has a lot of great spells and with ready access to buffs and an excellent BAB end up with combat durabilty and damage that are quite competitive with a rogue or monk of the same level. I don't comprehend why you should expect more than that except that there is an inherent mentality that "if I'm not the most powerful character in the party then I can't have fun". Multiclassing is about give and take and yes, sometimes you give up synergy if you go for a build that "has it all". If you need to have just as good of buffs as the pure wizard in the party then what's his job? Why do you expect to be just as good as him and also be almost as good of a tank/warrior as the fighter? Where the heck is the bard in all this? Or the sorceror (who is casting the same level spells as you if you go wizard and without any combat ability whatsoever)? Heck, what does the cleric do but be a healbot?</p><p></p><p>...</p><p></p><p>As for those who are "ignoring me". Have at it. I'm providing an alternative view. I'm a DM and I'm also a professional game developer (albeit video games, not pen and paper). Balance is important to me and I have a lot of experience creating game systems. The term "viable" in the title meant to me "what is viable gameplay-wise" and I'm just offering my opinion on that. An opinion that you can take or leave as you will.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StGabe, post: 3395428, member: 49275"] FWIW, the character that is effectively a gestalt fighter/mage is the Abjurant Champion. As I stated, the classes that do at least slightly stagger the casting progression and/or the hit die are at least a start towards balance. The EK, for example, is far closer to balanced than the Champion although a quick comparison to other classes demonstrates that it's not nearly there. It's all well and good to say "yeah but I just want to buff myself for combat". Ok, great. But you don't need level 9 spells for that and you really have no business having them with a BAB that is better than a rogue or a monks. All that's well and good, yet, you still do have those level 9 spells and the Wizard class was built with the lowest hit die and BAB for a reason -- the spells are *that* powerful. On whether a 10/10 fighter/mage is as powerful as other classes or not, I'll grant you that some synergy is lost. However, such a combo is still quite effective. You don't have to have Wish. Such a character still has a lot of great spells and with ready access to buffs and an excellent BAB end up with combat durabilty and damage that are quite competitive with a rogue or monk of the same level. I don't comprehend why you should expect more than that except that there is an inherent mentality that "if I'm not the most powerful character in the party then I can't have fun". Multiclassing is about give and take and yes, sometimes you give up synergy if you go for a build that "has it all". If you need to have just as good of buffs as the pure wizard in the party then what's his job? Why do you expect to be just as good as him and also be almost as good of a tank/warrior as the fighter? Where the heck is the bard in all this? Or the sorceror (who is casting the same level spells as you if you go wizard and without any combat ability whatsoever)? Heck, what does the cleric do but be a healbot? ... As for those who are "ignoring me". Have at it. I'm providing an alternative view. I'm a DM and I'm also a professional game developer (albeit video games, not pen and paper). Balance is important to me and I have a lot of experience creating game systems. The term "viable" in the title meant to me "what is viable gameplay-wise" and I'm just offering my opinion on that. An opinion that you can take or leave as you will. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Warrior-Mage Prestige Classes: which are viable & which are not
Top