Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Was 3rd edition fundamentaly flawed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 3866115" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>As others have noted, the notion of "fundamental flaw" is capable of different interpretations.</p><p></p><p>I think that there are five key aspects of 3E that the designers have identified as in need of repair:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">*Significant parts of the rules are not being used (or not used with pleasure) by a majority of the players of the game.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">This would include (for example) the grappling rules, and the elemental planes.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">This sort of problem is not caused by supplements and rules options - in fact, it can be fixed by them.</p></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">*Significant parts of the character build mechanics are hard to use well and/or a prone to misuse or breakage due to unforseen synergies.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">Examples of the first would include multi-classing with spellcasters. Examples of the second would include CoDzilla (though maybe some of that was foreseen, and offered as a carrot to have people play the healer). The role of magic items and "Christmas trees" in character build also fall under this heading.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Supplements can exacerbate this problem (by creating more unforseen synergies) or ameliorate it to an extent (by giving us more Mystic Theurges and Practiced Spellcasters, or new options for items as in the Magic Items Compendium). But in many ways it is better tackled from the ground up (eg the way that Conan tackles the magic item issue with its stat gain rules).</p></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">*Significant parts of the rules lead, due to the overall design logic, to an unsatisfactory play experience.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">Examples include those part of the spell rules that lead either to players of wizards frequently doing nothing, or to nova-ing and overshadowing non-spell-users.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">As far as I can see, this does go to the fundamentals of 3E mechanics. Solving it requires either:</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">(i) Changing the overall design logic by going back to 1st-ed assumptions about play - in particular, that the crux of the play experience will involve operational planning and GM-mediated solutions to non-mechanically expressed challenges; or,</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">(ii) Changing the suites of class abilities so that they work better with the present design logic - in particular, that the crux of the play experience will involve character build mechanics, and the overcoming of mechanically-expressed challenges by clever applicaiton of the action resolution mechanics</p></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Of RPGs that I'm familiar with, AD&D is the only one in which option (i) has ever been prominent, and the general trend of the game over the past 25 years has been away from it and towards (ii). Solution (ii) also has the advantage of addressing the second point above.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">The problem doesn't arise from supplements, and it can't be solved by them either. Fundamental change is needed.</p></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">*The game is very hard to GM, especially for high level play, because of the complexity of monster and NPC build rules (eg skill points) and the complexity of monster and NPC action resolution rules (eg the many spell-like abilities that high level monsters often have). </p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">Common build rules for PCs and NPCs/monsters is pretty fundamental to 3E, and is a flaw: what GMs are looking for in their play experience is quite different from what players are looking for (eg complexity of PC build is a plus for many players, but complexity of NPC/monster build is a minus for many GMs). Fixing these rules is not something that can be done via options and supplements.</p></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">*Currently, some aspects of trope and flavour are seen as impediments to easy uptake of the game, and particularly to easy GMing.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">These include sometimes obscure distinctions between monsters (eg demons and devils), and the perceived need to detail a world before the PCs can interact with it. The 4e designers are therefore changing those things (eg succubi become devils, "points of light" becomes the default setting).</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">These are pretty clearly not fundamental flaws.</p> </p><p></p><p>Anyway, that's my take on it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 3866115, member: 42582"] As others have noted, the notion of "fundamental flaw" is capable of different interpretations. I think that there are five key aspects of 3E that the designers have identified as in need of repair: [INDENT]*Significant parts of the rules are not being used (or not used with pleasure) by a majority of the players of the game. [INDENT]This would include (for example) the grappling rules, and the elemental planes. This sort of problem is not caused by supplements and rules options - in fact, it can be fixed by them.[/INDENT] *Significant parts of the character build mechanics are hard to use well and/or a prone to misuse or breakage due to unforseen synergies. [INDENT]Examples of the first would include multi-classing with spellcasters. Examples of the second would include CoDzilla (though maybe some of that was foreseen, and offered as a carrot to have people play the healer). The role of magic items and "Christmas trees" in character build also fall under this heading. Supplements can exacerbate this problem (by creating more unforseen synergies) or ameliorate it to an extent (by giving us more Mystic Theurges and Practiced Spellcasters, or new options for items as in the Magic Items Compendium). But in many ways it is better tackled from the ground up (eg the way that Conan tackles the magic item issue with its stat gain rules).[/INDENT] *Significant parts of the rules lead, due to the overall design logic, to an unsatisfactory play experience. [INDENT]Examples include those part of the spell rules that lead either to players of wizards frequently doing nothing, or to nova-ing and overshadowing non-spell-users. As far as I can see, this does go to the fundamentals of 3E mechanics. Solving it requires either: [INDENT](i) Changing the overall design logic by going back to 1st-ed assumptions about play - in particular, that the crux of the play experience will involve operational planning and GM-mediated solutions to non-mechanically expressed challenges; or, (ii) Changing the suites of class abilities so that they work better with the present design logic - in particular, that the crux of the play experience will involve character build mechanics, and the overcoming of mechanically-expressed challenges by clever applicaiton of the action resolution mechanics[/INDENT] Of RPGs that I'm familiar with, AD&D is the only one in which option (i) has ever been prominent, and the general trend of the game over the past 25 years has been away from it and towards (ii). Solution (ii) also has the advantage of addressing the second point above. The problem doesn't arise from supplements, and it can't be solved by them either. Fundamental change is needed.[/INDENT] *The game is very hard to GM, especially for high level play, because of the complexity of monster and NPC build rules (eg skill points) and the complexity of monster and NPC action resolution rules (eg the many spell-like abilities that high level monsters often have). [INDENT]Common build rules for PCs and NPCs/monsters is pretty fundamental to 3E, and is a flaw: what GMs are looking for in their play experience is quite different from what players are looking for (eg complexity of PC build is a plus for many players, but complexity of NPC/monster build is a minus for many GMs). Fixing these rules is not something that can be done via options and supplements.[/INDENT] *Currently, some aspects of trope and flavour are seen as impediments to easy uptake of the game, and particularly to easy GMing. [INDENT]These include sometimes obscure distinctions between monsters (eg demons and devils), and the perceived need to detail a world before the PCs can interact with it. The 4e designers are therefore changing those things (eg succubi become devils, "points of light" becomes the default setting). These are pretty clearly not fundamental flaws.[/INDENT][/INDENT] Anyway, that's my take on it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Was 3rd edition fundamentaly flawed?
Top