Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scribble" data-source="post: 5030635" data-attributes="member: 23977">OI'd go with biased- but hey.Yep- a fun edition of the D&D line. I'll agree with that one! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />And if you want to play a game of checkers with a jackrabbit you better not own a purple tie!Pointless metaphors aside, if 4e isn't your preferred edition that's cool- I couldn't really care any less if you like it or not.  If the rules don't work for you, that's cool- but don't insinuate that I'm either "pretending" or forcing the rules to work for what I want, or that I'm missing some sort of hidden design agenda you've managed to spot, or that the rules have moved away from "the true way the game should work"  in some way.  For me, the game plays the same way it's always played, with new tools to enhance the experience at the table. Everyone has their own way of interpreting what the rules mean in the game. Frankly the way you interpret a lot of the rules seems weird and alien to me, but to each his own.</blockquote>