Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Was AD&D1 designed for game balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 5042384" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>They still have terrible AC and hit points and level slower. In fact, if you start at a given XP total, which only makes sense, the wizard may start out lower level. In any case, practical experience suggests people play a variety of classes for a variety of reasons. I know that in Pool of Radiance, my "all fighter/MU plus one cleric/wizard" strategy ultimately proved to be an utter failure, even when I cheated to gain extra XP and maxed out everyone's levels. I think that game had a cap of either 6th or 8th level. </p><p></p><p>It's true, around 19th level, a MU is going to have dizzying options, but the hit point disparity only gets wider, and that vorpal sword ain't gonna wield itself. In 1e, it was a rare wizard who could outfighter a fighter, even with Tenser's transformation. In 4e, that kind of balance is actually substantially worse, since you never know who is going to crowd in on your turf. </p><p></p><p>In GURPS, you can spend your points literally anywhere you think is worthwhile. I have found that players appreciate GURPS for its options, rather than decrying that some options are more powerful in some respects than others. Options is options. </p><p></p><p>Every game does it differently. In AD&D, a wizard has to brave out whatever levels, unless you start out maybe 11th level or higher when they have access to some wilder spells, they get d4s for hit points, max out at +2 hit points per hit die, and get +1 hit point only past 10th level. They have to commit a high enough Int to learn and cast their spells. Meanwhile, a fighter is free to sink a high score into Str or Con. Barring a really low hit point roll at 1st level, he's tough at virtually every level. By 12th level, he might begin to look a little like the M-U's assistant, except, well, he owns a castle and commands hundreds of men-at-arms of his own and has a sword that can pierce the hide of any monster, and three or four times as many hit points as a M-U.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 5042384, member: 15538"] They still have terrible AC and hit points and level slower. In fact, if you start at a given XP total, which only makes sense, the wizard may start out lower level. In any case, practical experience suggests people play a variety of classes for a variety of reasons. I know that in Pool of Radiance, my "all fighter/MU plus one cleric/wizard" strategy ultimately proved to be an utter failure, even when I cheated to gain extra XP and maxed out everyone's levels. I think that game had a cap of either 6th or 8th level. It's true, around 19th level, a MU is going to have dizzying options, but the hit point disparity only gets wider, and that vorpal sword ain't gonna wield itself. In 1e, it was a rare wizard who could outfighter a fighter, even with Tenser's transformation. In 4e, that kind of balance is actually substantially worse, since you never know who is going to crowd in on your turf. In GURPS, you can spend your points literally anywhere you think is worthwhile. I have found that players appreciate GURPS for its options, rather than decrying that some options are more powerful in some respects than others. Options is options. Every game does it differently. In AD&D, a wizard has to brave out whatever levels, unless you start out maybe 11th level or higher when they have access to some wilder spells, they get d4s for hit points, max out at +2 hit points per hit die, and get +1 hit point only past 10th level. They have to commit a high enough Int to learn and cast their spells. Meanwhile, a fighter is free to sink a high score into Str or Con. Barring a really low hit point roll at 1st level, he's tough at virtually every level. By 12th level, he might begin to look a little like the M-U's assistant, except, well, he owns a castle and commands hundreds of men-at-arms of his own and has a sword that can pierce the hide of any monster, and three or four times as many hit points as a M-U. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Was AD&D1 designed for game balance?
Top