Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Was the rogue really updated?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="(Psi)SeveredHead" data-source="post: 5412139" data-attributes="member: 1165"><p>No. I killed plenty of rogues in 3.x.</p><p></p><p>It's a combination of them being "glass cannons" or "glass ninjas"; they can dish it out (making them threats), but they can't take it (low hit points). They don't have a lot of hit points. Also, fighters were pretty weak. Sneak attack was a lot scarier than the fighter's class feature of +2 or +4 damage, depending on level.</p><p></p><p>Worse, they had the lowest important saves. Rogues have low Fort and Will saves, and little incentive (other than boosting saves) to boost those stats, especially Wisdom.</p><p></p><p>And on top of that, rogues (and rangers) frequently scout ahead of the party, far enough that the fighter's clanking won't alert enemies. The rogue might only be one round ahead of his friends, but if he's facing a dire tiger (Scent!) or demonically infused elemental (a template that gives an elemental permanent haste) or anything else that can dish out grappling or full-round attacks or monk death touch or anything lethal like that during the surprise round, the rogue might die before the party can catch up to them.</p><p></p><p>(I've killed rogues even when they've been <em>cautious</em>. Back in 3.0 I used a beholder. They sucked. A cleric with a crossbow could kill one in one round [after the cleric had dropped Flame Strike, the beholder had used its Anti-Magic Cone on the wizard, fearing its greater damage output]. The rogue climbed a tree, gaining cover and concealment. The beholder spazzed out some rays, managing to tag the rogue's high touch AC despite the cover and getting through the concealment. It was the disintegrate ray. Pfff!!! No more rogue.)</p><p></p><p>In 4e their survivability is greater. Low Con has little effect on hit points, and your hit points are more than decent too, plus leaders can heal you with a minor action. A rogue will frequently flank an enemy alongside a defender who will mark the target. While the rogue is dishing out more damage, the enemy has to choose between killing the rogue (a strategic option) or going after the defender (they have higher AC and do less damage, but you're not at -2 to hit and you won't be taking free hits [from a fighter] or radiant damage [from a paladin]).</p><p></p><p>(My current Dark Sun party has a defender, who tends to stick near the spellcasters, while a rogue and barbarian go forth. Barbarians can only protect their allies by seeming like a greater threat, not being actual defenders.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="(Psi)SeveredHead, post: 5412139, member: 1165"] No. I killed plenty of rogues in 3.x. It's a combination of them being "glass cannons" or "glass ninjas"; they can dish it out (making them threats), but they can't take it (low hit points). They don't have a lot of hit points. Also, fighters were pretty weak. Sneak attack was a lot scarier than the fighter's class feature of +2 or +4 damage, depending on level. Worse, they had the lowest important saves. Rogues have low Fort and Will saves, and little incentive (other than boosting saves) to boost those stats, especially Wisdom. And on top of that, rogues (and rangers) frequently scout ahead of the party, far enough that the fighter's clanking won't alert enemies. The rogue might only be one round ahead of his friends, but if he's facing a dire tiger (Scent!) or demonically infused elemental (a template that gives an elemental permanent haste) or anything else that can dish out grappling or full-round attacks or monk death touch or anything lethal like that during the surprise round, the rogue might die before the party can catch up to them. (I've killed rogues even when they've been [i]cautious[/i]. Back in 3.0 I used a beholder. They sucked. A cleric with a crossbow could kill one in one round [after the cleric had dropped Flame Strike, the beholder had used its Anti-Magic Cone on the wizard, fearing its greater damage output]. The rogue climbed a tree, gaining cover and concealment. The beholder spazzed out some rays, managing to tag the rogue's high touch AC despite the cover and getting through the concealment. It was the disintegrate ray. Pfff!!! No more rogue.) In 4e their survivability is greater. Low Con has little effect on hit points, and your hit points are more than decent too, plus leaders can heal you with a minor action. A rogue will frequently flank an enemy alongside a defender who will mark the target. While the rogue is dishing out more damage, the enemy has to choose between killing the rogue (a strategic option) or going after the defender (they have higher AC and do less damage, but you're not at -2 to hit and you won't be taking free hits [from a fighter] or radiant damage [from a paladin]). (My current Dark Sun party has a defender, who tends to stick near the spellcasters, while a rogue and barbarian go forth. Barbarians can only protect their allies by seeming like a greater threat, not being actual defenders.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Was the rogue really updated?
Top