Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Watchmen Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Firebeetle" data-source="post: 4697111" data-attributes="member: 34506"><p>As some of you may know, I'm a part-time projectionist at a local movie theater. It is part of my duties to ensure that movies are put together correctly. It was I who caught the out-of-sequence reels on the Express, and the backwards reel on Nim's Island. Of course, much drek must be seen in this duty.</p><p></p><p>Drek is not the case with Watchmen. This movie manages to translate Moore's masterpiece to the screen faithfully. Many sequences are completely as I pictured them, and others far improved. The characterization feels spot on, each actor bringing their character to life perfectly. Notable is the soft-spoken performance of Dr. Manhattan, who practically whispers while he describes the dance of atoms, and the gravelly rasp of Rorschach, who embodies comic's most notorious detective perfectly.</p><p></p><p>The movie has a lot of hoops to jump through and it does an excellent job of them. It translates the visuals of the comic, not just in frame but in sense of timing. You see event unfold often at the same pace suggested by the book. In cinematic terms, this is a risky move but director Snyder pulls it off well. </p><p></p><p>The book "fugues" carrying multiple storylines in multiple times simultaneously. Although simplified, much of this occurs on screen as well. I am concerned that people will have trouble following, but people often surprise me. </p><p></p><p>The book happens in an alternate 1985, which is now 22 years further away then when the book was written. Snyder again handles most of this in the title sequence, and has frequent reminders of the cold war throughout. There are several 80s references throughout the movie to remind you of where you are (chronologically), such as Ted Koppel doing the Manhatten interview, of MTV ads on TV.</p><p></p><p>The story, of course, is epic in scope. Again, the film does an excellent job here. The essential points are still present, minor changes are made, often for the better. In particular, I liked the ending better. It has been altered, but it now ties things up better than the original. You'll have to see it. </p><p></p><p>I really look forward to seeing this one again. Don't hesitate, this is one terrific movie and well worth the 22 year wait. I know a thousand fanboys will pan the effort, but what is the use in trying to please those who will not be pleased by anything? Dr. Manhatten's Martian sequences are worth the price of admission alone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Firebeetle, post: 4697111, member: 34506"] As some of you may know, I'm a part-time projectionist at a local movie theater. It is part of my duties to ensure that movies are put together correctly. It was I who caught the out-of-sequence reels on the Express, and the backwards reel on Nim's Island. Of course, much drek must be seen in this duty. Drek is not the case with Watchmen. This movie manages to translate Moore's masterpiece to the screen faithfully. Many sequences are completely as I pictured them, and others far improved. The characterization feels spot on, each actor bringing their character to life perfectly. Notable is the soft-spoken performance of Dr. Manhattan, who practically whispers while he describes the dance of atoms, and the gravelly rasp of Rorschach, who embodies comic's most notorious detective perfectly. The movie has a lot of hoops to jump through and it does an excellent job of them. It translates the visuals of the comic, not just in frame but in sense of timing. You see event unfold often at the same pace suggested by the book. In cinematic terms, this is a risky move but director Snyder pulls it off well. The book "fugues" carrying multiple storylines in multiple times simultaneously. Although simplified, much of this occurs on screen as well. I am concerned that people will have trouble following, but people often surprise me. The book happens in an alternate 1985, which is now 22 years further away then when the book was written. Snyder again handles most of this in the title sequence, and has frequent reminders of the cold war throughout. There are several 80s references throughout the movie to remind you of where you are (chronologically), such as Ted Koppel doing the Manhatten interview, of MTV ads on TV. The story, of course, is epic in scope. Again, the film does an excellent job here. The essential points are still present, minor changes are made, often for the better. In particular, I liked the ending better. It has been altered, but it now ties things up better than the original. You'll have to see it. I really look forward to seeing this one again. Don't hesitate, this is one terrific movie and well worth the 22 year wait. I know a thousand fanboys will pan the effort, but what is the use in trying to please those who will not be pleased by anything? Dr. Manhatten's Martian sequences are worth the price of admission alone. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Watchmen Review
Top