Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="green slime" data-source="post: 402970" data-attributes="member: 1325">Interesting comments RangerWickett.I wouldn't have a rainshower discharge the spell.I would like to point out, however, that I do believe the rules point out that if you are &quot;holding a charge&quot;, that touching something other than your intended target discharges the spell, whether it is a legitmate target or not. So this disqualifies the requirement for the touched object to be a legitmate target. This in order to prevent players cast harm, then carrying a torch, shield, or two-handed weapon in that hand. Thusly, you must ask yourself, what is of sufficient substance to discharge the spell? The line I decided to draw was at liquids; although I would allow a character to try to discharge on a gaseous form as well. But I can understand that some may feel that the line should be drawn at solids, allowing water breathing creatures to cast stoneshape unhindered underwater.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="green slime, post: 402970, member: 1325"] Interesting comments RangerWickett. I wouldn't have a rainshower discharge the spell. I would like to point out, however, that I do believe the rules point out that if you are "holding a charge", that touching something other than your intended target discharges the spell, whether it is a legitmate target or not. So this disqualifies the requirement for the touched object to be a legitmate target. This in order to prevent players cast [i]harm[/i], then carrying a torch, shield, or two-handed weapon in that hand. Thusly, you must ask yourself, what is of sufficient substance to discharge the spell? The line I decided to draw was at liquids; although I would allow a character to try to discharge on a gaseous form as well. But I can understand that some may feel that the line should be drawn at solids, allowing [i]water breathing[/i] creatures to cast [i]stoneshape[/i] unhindered underwater. [/QUOTE]

Verification