Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Water, water everywhere, Nor any drop to drink
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6825067" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>Because it's so hypocritical. As I pointed out, people will bend over backwards to ignore the inconsistencies in their own arguments. It's okay for me to tell your character how to act and believe, because magic. I can force you to take extra actions, heal, hit better, take less damage, and a multitude of other things, despite the fact that it makes little sense in the game world, and it's okay because its magic. The character that hates music still gets inspired by the bard. The character that's diametrically opposed to your beliefs still gains HP. And, note, the argument is that people don't want other players telling them what to do. So, when that wizard hits you with Haste and grants you extra actions, he's telling you what to do. But, that's okay because... altogether now ... magic.</p><p></p><p>Like I said, if the argument was at all consistent, then I'd be a lot more sympathetic. But, it's not. A cleric with an at-will cantrip that granted an ally an attack when cast would pass muster without a comment, regardless of the alignment or beliefs of the ally. Heck, as it stands, clerics (and druids) already have a cantrip that grants buffs on any skill checks. Doesn't matter what your deity is or what your deity is about, drop a Guidance spell and someone gets a +d4 on a skill. My Cleric of War can buff your History check for some reason... oh right.... <em>maaaagic</em>. But, apparently, a warlord doing <u>exactly the same thing</u> but without casting a spell is completely unbelievable. </p><p></p><p>So, yes, this is why I sneer at the arguments being dropped here. They're about as consistent as a wet cardboard box. And hold as much water. For some reason, we don't see constant, daily agitation to change clerics, druids, battle masters, bards and Mastermind thieves. They don't apparently rate high enough as an issue to get their own forum ghetto, exiled out of the mainstream conversation by constant, never ending, thread crapping by people who have made it their mission in life to prevent any 4e elements from polluting the wonderment of 5e.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6825067, member: 22779"] Because it's so hypocritical. As I pointed out, people will bend over backwards to ignore the inconsistencies in their own arguments. It's okay for me to tell your character how to act and believe, because magic. I can force you to take extra actions, heal, hit better, take less damage, and a multitude of other things, despite the fact that it makes little sense in the game world, and it's okay because its magic. The character that hates music still gets inspired by the bard. The character that's diametrically opposed to your beliefs still gains HP. And, note, the argument is that people don't want other players telling them what to do. So, when that wizard hits you with Haste and grants you extra actions, he's telling you what to do. But, that's okay because... altogether now ... magic. Like I said, if the argument was at all consistent, then I'd be a lot more sympathetic. But, it's not. A cleric with an at-will cantrip that granted an ally an attack when cast would pass muster without a comment, regardless of the alignment or beliefs of the ally. Heck, as it stands, clerics (and druids) already have a cantrip that grants buffs on any skill checks. Doesn't matter what your deity is or what your deity is about, drop a Guidance spell and someone gets a +d4 on a skill. My Cleric of War can buff your History check for some reason... oh right.... [i]maaaagic[/i]. But, apparently, a warlord doing [u]exactly the same thing[/u] but without casting a spell is completely unbelievable. So, yes, this is why I sneer at the arguments being dropped here. They're about as consistent as a wet cardboard box. And hold as much water. For some reason, we don't see constant, daily agitation to change clerics, druids, battle masters, bards and Mastermind thieves. They don't apparently rate high enough as an issue to get their own forum ghetto, exiled out of the mainstream conversation by constant, never ending, thread crapping by people who have made it their mission in life to prevent any 4e elements from polluting the wonderment of 5e. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Water, water everywhere, Nor any drop to drink
Top