NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 6834075" data-attributes="member: 996">There's really no need.  Some people might want to exclude the new Mystic, or existing classes like the Paladin or Warlock or whatever, for a wide variety of reasons.  One is always free to hold an opinion or have a preference.It's hard to imagine a scenario where anyone would be forced to play one.  Though, in any scenario where a number of other classes have already been dropped from a setting, one of the remaining ones might be left to soul source of something critical.  We weren't talking about my opinions, but about facts alluded to up-thread, I think by Mellored, but I'm not sure at this point, since no nested quoting on EN World ('nuther pet peeve). <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Nor was it inescapably implied.  And, those were all fluff text, and subject to change even at the player level.  In 5e, of course, it's the DM that rules how things work, so a DM who wanted to stick you with a specific, hypothetically offensive, fluff always could.  Probably among the least of things a DM could do to wreck your play experience, though, you prettymuch gotta trust us DMs.   :<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/angel.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angel:" title="Angel    :angel:" data-shortname=":angel:" />:</blockquote>

Verification