Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Snotlord" data-source="post: 2343831" data-attributes="member: 25361">Sounds like we agree for the most part. They CoR is far from great, but disregarding it altogether is IMO a bit harsh, because it is lots of good stuff in it (Eltab, Malkizid, Nodes, Shrines, the Epic spells, Eldreth Veluunthra, the Initiate feats) and very little bad stuff (bland yes, not bad).I agree that Kezef should have been more powerful. FR is a nice place to develop Epic material, and every opportunity should be pondered wisely, but I am largely content with using the likes of Orcus as the CR benchmark instead of the gods themselves, even if that does not mesh very well with the novels. Statblock errors are embarrasing for wotc to be sure, but it does not make the material useless IMO.The only things I truly loathed was the Grey Portrait (homages to great books is nice, but has nothing to do with the setting) and using the E-word when talking about Mulholrand on page 111 (setting material should not not include real-world references, it spoils the illusion).(Edited for clarity)</blockquote>