Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Deset Gled" data-source="post: 9859433" data-attributes="member: 7808">This feels like a lot of whataboutism to me.Wotc burned down the OGL. But what about Daggerheart? What about Draw Steel? What about the price of tea in China?Any of these other games having development and success is independent of WotC's actions. They are neither better off nor worse off. Your own argument from the OP is &quot;Most people probably don't care. They're here for D&amp;D and never pay attention to the brand.&quot; If they don't care enough for the OGL fiasco to matter, how can you claim they care enough to say the success of these games is tied to the OGL fiasco?&quot;We all won.&quot; Won what? Nothing. We won nothing. In a battle we didn't want to fight against an enemy we didn't want to oppose on a field we didn't want to be in.You can celebrate not losing, of course. That's justified. But it's really not the same thing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Deset Gled, post: 9859433, member: 7808"] This feels like a lot of whataboutism to me. Wotc burned down the OGL. But what about Daggerheart? What about Draw Steel? What about the price of tea in China? Any of these other games having development and success is independent of WotC's actions. They are neither better off nor worse off. Your own argument from the OP is "Most people probably don't care. They're here for D&D and never pay attention to the brand." If they don't care enough for the OGL fiasco to matter, how can you claim they care enough to say the success of these games is tied to the OGL fiasco? "We all won." Won what? Nothing. We won nothing. In a battle we didn't want to fight against an enemy we didn't want to oppose on a field we didn't want to be in. You can celebrate not losing, of course. That's justified. But it's really not the same thing. [/QUOTE]

Verification