Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
We have Arcane, Divine, and Primal lists now. Why not Psionic?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 9069849" data-attributes="member: 58172"><p>That is the definition of spell components being useless superfluous clutter.</p><p></p><p>Remove the spell components, and there is little or no loss.</p><p></p><p>The game is better.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In earlier editions, encumbrance were a pain point a hassle to track, and not worth tracking. 5e removed encumbrance from the default game.</p><p></p><p>To compare spell components with encumbrance tracking suggests the 5e design does well to remove spell components from the default game.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But spell components are worse than encumbrance. The spell components are extraneous clutter. More, spell components aggressively interfere with the mechanics of the rest of the game.</p><p></p><p>Spell components contradict the spellcasting methods of many classes. The Dancer Bard cannot cast spells by a magical dance. The vocalist cannot cast spells by song. The musician cannot cast spells via playing a musical instrument. The commander cannot create magic by words of power. The Sorcerer cannot cast magic by being innately magical. The spell components are an ongoing aggravating pain point for many psionic fans. The innate magic of the Fey and other magical creatures stumble over the spell description and often lose access to many spells because of the useless costly component that falsely claims to be a balancing method.</p><p></p><p>The routine "spell focus" of most classes already contradicts the material component of the spell descriptions. The material component "M" is strictly useless most of the time − and is actively interferesome otherwise.</p><p></p><p>Many different character concepts need to use the same spell descriptions. Almost all classes as well certain subclasses already officially reject the spell components, by listing a focus to replace part of it. Some classes and subclasses offer other methods to replace the somatic component, such as warrior spellcasters who have weapons occupying their hands, and some cast silently. The spell components strictly contradict the rest of the game, and fail to function as a balancing mechanic, and fail to offer any benefit to the 5e game.</p><p></p><p>The spell descriptions must be agnostic about which sources and which classes are casting them. The same spell descriptions are for the spell lists of different magical sources with different theories of magic, and for the spell lists of different classes with different spell casting methods.</p><p></p><p>Spell components need to get out of the way of the D&D players.</p><p></p><p>The spell components are like an infected appendix, and appendicitis that designers need to surgically remove from the D&D game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The spell components actively interfere with many character concepts. The spell components are an official, intrusive, ubiquitous, useless, complicating, eyesore that is impossible to ignore.</p><p></p><p>It is wrong to make the D&D game inferior because of a disruptive sentimentality that (most?) players already agree to ignore.</p><p></p><p>The spell components are worse than something useless and ignorable to track as an accountant.</p><p></p><p>The spell components are a problem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 9069849, member: 58172"] That is the definition of spell components being useless superfluous clutter. Remove the spell components, and there is little or no loss. The game is better. In earlier editions, encumbrance were a pain point a hassle to track, and not worth tracking. 5e removed encumbrance from the default game. To compare spell components with encumbrance tracking suggests the 5e design does well to remove spell components from the default game. But spell components are worse than encumbrance. The spell components are extraneous clutter. More, spell components aggressively interfere with the mechanics of the rest of the game. Spell components contradict the spellcasting methods of many classes. The Dancer Bard cannot cast spells by a magical dance. The vocalist cannot cast spells by song. The musician cannot cast spells via playing a musical instrument. The commander cannot create magic by words of power. The Sorcerer cannot cast magic by being innately magical. The spell components are an ongoing aggravating pain point for many psionic fans. The innate magic of the Fey and other magical creatures stumble over the spell description and often lose access to many spells because of the useless costly component that falsely claims to be a balancing method. The routine "spell focus" of most classes already contradicts the material component of the spell descriptions. The material component "M" is strictly useless most of the time − and is actively interferesome otherwise. Many different character concepts need to use the same spell descriptions. Almost all classes as well certain subclasses already officially reject the spell components, by listing a focus to replace part of it. Some classes and subclasses offer other methods to replace the somatic component, such as warrior spellcasters who have weapons occupying their hands, and some cast silently. The spell components strictly contradict the rest of the game, and fail to function as a balancing mechanic, and fail to offer any benefit to the 5e game. The spell descriptions must be agnostic about which sources and which classes are casting them. The same spell descriptions are for the spell lists of different magical sources with different theories of magic, and for the spell lists of different classes with different spell casting methods. Spell components need to get out of the way of the D&D players. The spell components are like an infected appendix, and appendicitis that designers need to surgically remove from the D&D game. The spell components actively interfere with many character concepts. The spell components are an official, intrusive, ubiquitous, useless, complicating, eyesore that is impossible to ignore. It is wrong to make the D&D game inferior because of a disruptive sentimentality that (most?) players already agree to ignore. The spell components are worse than something useless and ignorable to track as an accountant. The spell components are a problem. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
We have Arcane, Divine, and Primal lists now. Why not Psionic?
Top