Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
We really need a AI tag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 9840440" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>"Technically correct is the best kind of correct." - Futurama</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you would do well to reconsider what "hyperbolic" means. </p><p></p><p>Billions of dollars of content were taken without permission, in an attempt to make <em>trillions</em> in revenue, for which the content creators are apt to receive precisely bupkis. We agree on this, yes?</p><p></p><p>It may be technically incorrect to call that "theft", but in terms of the <em>magnitude</em> of the offense, there's no exaggeration going on. Indeed, "theft" seems entirely inadequate for the amount of recompense the content creators are collectively being cheated out of. So, not really hyperbolic at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A single large AI data center can use 5 million gallons of water per day - on the order of the use by 10K to 50K people. </p><p></p><p>When you put that near a town of 10K to 50K people (like, say, my home in the Boston suburbs) you just doubled their water use, without improving the water supply. Unless maybe AI data centers can also make it rain, or are also massive desalination plants?</p><p></p><p>Moreover, that extra use is expanding to the tune of <em>trillions</em> of dollars of investment in the next five years. Even if AI data centers aren't using more than other industrial processes, putting that much new use from <em>any</em> industrial process would strain local resources. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You may not realize, but here you effectively wrap up all the resistance as "emotional", dismiss it, and shame those who disagree, all in one sentence. While kind of impressive in terms of brevity, I don't think you'll find it <em>persuasive</em>.</p><p></p><p>The profit for this isn't going into the pockets of the typical person on the street. That person on the street is more likely to lose their job, or see their utility costs rise, than get a share of the revenue. </p><p></p><p>When you want people to accept a burden for <em>someone else's</em> benefit, waggling fingers about being emotional nor not doing the homework you assign may not be the way to go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 9840440, member: 177"] "Technically correct is the best kind of correct." - Futurama I think you would do well to reconsider what "hyperbolic" means. Billions of dollars of content were taken without permission, in an attempt to make [I]trillions[/I] in revenue, for which the content creators are apt to receive precisely bupkis. We agree on this, yes? It may be technically incorrect to call that "theft", but in terms of the [I]magnitude[/I] of the offense, there's no exaggeration going on. Indeed, "theft" seems entirely inadequate for the amount of recompense the content creators are collectively being cheated out of. So, not really hyperbolic at all. A single large AI data center can use 5 million gallons of water per day - on the order of the use by 10K to 50K people. When you put that near a town of 10K to 50K people (like, say, my home in the Boston suburbs) you just doubled their water use, without improving the water supply. Unless maybe AI data centers can also make it rain, or are also massive desalination plants? Moreover, that extra use is expanding to the tune of [I]trillions[/I] of dollars of investment in the next five years. Even if AI data centers aren't using more than other industrial processes, putting that much new use from [I]any[/I] industrial process would strain local resources. You may not realize, but here you effectively wrap up all the resistance as "emotional", dismiss it, and shame those who disagree, all in one sentence. While kind of impressive in terms of brevity, I don't think you'll find it [I]persuasive[/I]. The profit for this isn't going into the pockets of the typical person on the street. That person on the street is more likely to lose their job, or see their utility costs rise, than get a share of the revenue. When you want people to accept a burden for [I]someone else's[/I] benefit, waggling fingers about being emotional nor not doing the homework you assign may not be the way to go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
We really need a AI tag
Top