Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 6326003" data-attributes="member: 14506"><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?325779-Saving-Throws-through-the-editions" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?325779-Saving-Throws-through-the-editions</a>That is a thread that discussed the save options throughout the editions. I also rail against the 6 point proficiency difference in character saves at high level. I think my first thing I house rule will be everyone has proficiency in every save. Like in the thread I like the feel of high level characters saving at a higher clip than low level characters. This is essentially accounted for by the proficiency bonus. It will also counteract the proficiency bonus of casters. Casters will still have a good chance if they target a non-prime stat.The other consideration is multi-classed characters will they pick up new stats they are proficient in? Easier to have them proficient in all.But who knows they may have something they added later on about this. We shall see.Edit: Another potential house rule could be proficiency means +4* period, in effect removing the scaling.*Or some other number.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sadrik, post: 6326003, member: 14506"] [url]http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?325779-Saving-Throws-through-the-editions[/url] That is a thread that discussed the save options throughout the editions. I also rail against the 6 point proficiency difference in character saves at high level. I think my first thing I house rule will be everyone has proficiency in every save. Like in the thread I like the feel of high level characters saving at a higher clip than low level characters. This is essentially accounted for by the proficiency bonus. It will also counteract the proficiency bonus of casters. Casters will still have a good chance if they target a non-prime stat. The other consideration is multi-classed characters will they pick up new stats they are proficient in? Easier to have them proficient in all. But who knows they may have something they added later on about this. We shall see. Edit: Another potential house rule could be proficiency means +4* period, in effect removing the scaling. *Or some other number. [/QUOTE]

Verification