Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8659875" data-attributes="member: 6987520">No they haven't, and no you can't. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :P"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />Ok, you can obviously if you want to, but I don't even like how simple they made them in 5E. I prefer individual weapons proficiencies because, let's be honest:1) nobody knows how to use all weapons2) most PCs (IME) have 2-4 weapons at most they use regularly.As for armor, you do train in that as well. How to put it on, get used to its weight and balance, learn to maintain it, and most importantly how it is best used to protect you and just how far that protection extends.I don't know if individual armor proficiencies would be necessary, but the three groups in 5E are distinct enough without going overboard IMO.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8659875, member: 6987520"] No they haven't, and no you can't. :P Ok, you [I]can[/I] obviously if you want to, but I don't even like how simple they made them in 5E. I prefer individual weapons proficiencies because, let's be honest: 1) nobody knows how to use all weapons 2) most PCs (IME) have 2-4 weapons at most they use regularly. As for armor, you do train in that as well. How to put it on, get used to its weight and balance, learn to maintain it, and most importantly how it is best used to protect you and just how far that protection extends. I don't know if individual armor proficiencies would be necessary, but the three groups in 5E are distinct enough without going overboard IMO. [/QUOTE]

Verification