Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crazydwarf" data-source="post: 4453953" data-attributes="member: 73982">True, but so can a group of PC's, wich is why it's important fighters need to be "sticky" so the others can do their stuff. A THW adds a little stickiness, a shield lets them be stickier a little longer.Again milage may wary depending on the DM's tactics and choice of monsters for the evening. And difficult, if not downright impossible to account for. I wouldn't know, I have never played AD&D pre 4e.It's a system local only to scandinavia I belive, and it wasn't level based.   Looks about right, I'm gonna have to get back to you on this later though, after a thorough think through.One problem with boosting THW is that we do not want a defender to outshine the strikers.And from some sources a well built fighter can allready come close, though how that is possible I do not know, and it speaks ill for strikers if true IMHO <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/nervous.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":heh:" title="Nervous Laugh    :heh:" data-shortname=":heh:" /> I was aiming for simplicity with a minimum of variations, and I was thinking doing the middle level of each tier (5,15,25 right ?) But mine also makes a bad testing grounds for certain weapons, those with reach for starters as I wasnt planning to use minis and terrain at all. I'm not even sure what I think of reach weapons...Too little experience with the game yet.</blockquote>