Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Weapon Groups
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 3607938" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>Both of those have worked really well. The firearm/ray concept (i.e., the "point and click" aiming system) originally came about because we just had them in sepearate categories separately, but only casters took Ray, and only non-casters took Firearms. So we merged them for bookkeeping purposes, but then realized that they fit together surprisingly well.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, here's the catch. There are only 8 weapon categories, right?</p><p>Fighters start with 2 categories, and at level 3 they add a third. But, that's misleading, because any "Simple" weapons don't require a proficiency... they're just lumped into the martial categories for purposes of Weapon Focus, etc. And practically ALL weapons in the "Natural" category are simple, so he effectively gets that one for free. And what are the chances that a low-level character will be using Firearms? So, by level 12, the Fighter will have 6 of the 8 groups, and will effectively be proficient with everything.</p><p></p><p>Originally, we had Fighters getting an MWP at every odd level (so that they'd get something at every level) plus two at level 1, with Rangers, Paladins, and Barbarians (the other "Full BAB classes) getting one every 3 levels and one at level 1, the Rogue and Bard got one every 4 levels and one at level 1, and Monks didn't get anything but the EWP(Monk Weapons) feat and the Simple weapons. But in practice this resulted in weapon-using characters becoming proficient with all of the weapons they needed very quickly. See, most classes don't use every weapon type. If someone's using swords predominantly, they don't really need to also have the Blunt and Hafted groups as well. And Thrown isn't used often if you've got Projectile, and vice versa. Most characters only need two categories (one melee, one ranged), and the Simple weapons. By level 8 or 9, proficiencies had become a non-issue, and we didn't like that. Of course, if you prefer that sort of proficiency rate, then our old system is what you'd want.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's just far too much, if there's only 8 categories. All weapon-using classes would be proficient with everything by level 10 at the absolute latest, and they'd have all of their "essential" groups by level 3. See previous discussion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sort of. You'd still be wielding the double-bladed sword, but you'd only really be attacking with one end at a time; the other end would only really be used for parrying and such, although you could switch offensive ends as you went. You're not totally untrained with the weapon (you DO have the Martial proficiency, after all); you're just not good enough with it to be able to shift it back and forth fast enough to use both ends offensively <em>at the same time</em>, which is what the extra attack represents. So, in game effect it'd be effectively the same as a longsword (1d8 damage per "attack", 19-20/x2, no extra attacks for the other end), but you're not wielding it the same way you would a longsword. Less slashing, more jabbing.</p><p>Think of the quarterstaff. Someone without the EWP could still smack someone with it, or jab with it, or whatever, but someone with the EWP could do far more with it.</p><p></p><p>We did that with all of the EWPs. In most cases, there's no real "penalty" for lacking the EWP, but having it gives extra abilities to the weapon. (I qualified the "penalty" part because in some cases we added a penalty to the weapon itself, and then have the EWP's "bonus" offset the penalty). The only EWP with an actual -4 nonproficiency penalty is EWP(Mercurial).</p><p>Take the Bastard Sword as an example; in our world, it's a Large weapon, and can be wielded as one without any EWP. But, if you have EWP(Heavy Weapons), you can wield it as if it was one size smaller (Medium). That EWP group also includes a dozen other weapons, some of which are smaller; for instance, the Wakizashi is Medium, so with the EWP it'd be treated as Small, meaning you could dual-wield it without a size penalty. And the Fullblade is Huge, normally, so with the EWP it'd be treated as a Large, meaning a Human could use it with two hands. Three different ways to benefit from the single Feat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 3607938, member: 3051"] Both of those have worked really well. The firearm/ray concept (i.e., the "point and click" aiming system) originally came about because we just had them in sepearate categories separately, but only casters took Ray, and only non-casters took Firearms. So we merged them for bookkeeping purposes, but then realized that they fit together surprisingly well. Well, here's the catch. There are only 8 weapon categories, right? Fighters start with 2 categories, and at level 3 they add a third. But, that's misleading, because any "Simple" weapons don't require a proficiency... they're just lumped into the martial categories for purposes of Weapon Focus, etc. And practically ALL weapons in the "Natural" category are simple, so he effectively gets that one for free. And what are the chances that a low-level character will be using Firearms? So, by level 12, the Fighter will have 6 of the 8 groups, and will effectively be proficient with everything. Originally, we had Fighters getting an MWP at every odd level (so that they'd get something at every level) plus two at level 1, with Rangers, Paladins, and Barbarians (the other "Full BAB classes) getting one every 3 levels and one at level 1, the Rogue and Bard got one every 4 levels and one at level 1, and Monks didn't get anything but the EWP(Monk Weapons) feat and the Simple weapons. But in practice this resulted in weapon-using characters becoming proficient with all of the weapons they needed very quickly. See, most classes don't use every weapon type. If someone's using swords predominantly, they don't really need to also have the Blunt and Hafted groups as well. And Thrown isn't used often if you've got Projectile, and vice versa. Most characters only need two categories (one melee, one ranged), and the Simple weapons. By level 8 or 9, proficiencies had become a non-issue, and we didn't like that. Of course, if you prefer that sort of proficiency rate, then our old system is what you'd want. That's just far too much, if there's only 8 categories. All weapon-using classes would be proficient with everything by level 10 at the absolute latest, and they'd have all of their "essential" groups by level 3. See previous discussion. Sort of. You'd still be wielding the double-bladed sword, but you'd only really be attacking with one end at a time; the other end would only really be used for parrying and such, although you could switch offensive ends as you went. You're not totally untrained with the weapon (you DO have the Martial proficiency, after all); you're just not good enough with it to be able to shift it back and forth fast enough to use both ends offensively [i]at the same time[/i], which is what the extra attack represents. So, in game effect it'd be effectively the same as a longsword (1d8 damage per "attack", 19-20/x2, no extra attacks for the other end), but you're not wielding it the same way you would a longsword. Less slashing, more jabbing. Think of the quarterstaff. Someone without the EWP could still smack someone with it, or jab with it, or whatever, but someone with the EWP could do far more with it. We did that with all of the EWPs. In most cases, there's no real "penalty" for lacking the EWP, but having it gives extra abilities to the weapon. (I qualified the "penalty" part because in some cases we added a penalty to the weapon itself, and then have the EWP's "bonus" offset the penalty). The only EWP with an actual -4 nonproficiency penalty is EWP(Mercurial). Take the Bastard Sword as an example; in our world, it's a Large weapon, and can be wielded as one without any EWP. But, if you have EWP(Heavy Weapons), you can wield it as if it was one size smaller (Medium). That EWP group also includes a dozen other weapons, some of which are smaller; for instance, the Wakizashi is Medium, so with the EWP it'd be treated as Small, meaning you could dual-wield it without a size penalty. And the Fullblade is Huge, normally, so with the EWP it'd be treated as a Large, meaning a Human could use it with two hands. Three different ways to benefit from the single Feat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Weapon Groups
Top