Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Darklone" data-source="post: 100344" data-attributes="member: 1372">Hmm.Ok, I am not gonna repeat the Sean Reynolds part...Another point. Why do you think heavy weapons are slower? Have you ever used them? I heard many dagger fanatics telling fairy tales about how fast two daggers are... Yet they will never hit as long as you don't have another friend with two daggers next to you that hops into the bastard sword of the enemy to block it from skewering you.I had pondered over that thing too... since I liked rules that differ between some weapons...I proposed some flavour rules once (very unrealistic) that gave some weapons a plus to damage, swords a bonus to parry (AC), axes and hammers more damage and long weapons a little bonus to initiative. If you think some weapons are faster, then the long weapons win the race. Even a greatsword will be first against a longsword. If the wielder is proficient.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Darklone, post: 100344, member: 1372"] [b]Hmm.[/b] Ok, I am not gonna repeat the Sean Reynolds part... Another point. Why do you think heavy weapons are slower? Have you ever used them? I heard many dagger fanatics telling fairy tales about how fast two daggers are... Yet they will never hit as long as you don't have another friend with two daggers next to you that hops into the bastard sword of the enemy to block it from skewering you. I had pondered over that thing too... since I liked rules that differ between some weapons... I proposed some flavour rules once (very unrealistic) that gave some weapons a plus to damage, swords a bonus to parry (AC), axes and hammers more damage and long weapons a little bonus to initiative. If you think some weapons are faster, then the long weapons win the race. Even a greatsword will be first against a longsword. If the wielder is proficient. [/QUOTE]

Verification