Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Weapons Locker info
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Krieg" data-source="post: 1371340" data-attributes="member: 5282"><p>I'm actually going to go back on what I said earlier. *gasp* lol</p><p></p><p>I'm betting that the M60 on the cover of the book is actually supposed to be an M60E4 (rather than E3) which was a short-barreled variant used by the SEAL teams. Under Navy nomenclature it would be the Mk 43 Mod 0. </p><p></p><p>I originally was thinking that the image on the cover was just poorly handled perspective, but I'm willing to bet the short barrel was intentional.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.usord.com/images/M60E4_large.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In the early 90's the USMC wanted to replace the M60E3 but didn't have the cash to develop a new weapon or procure them from an outside source. As resourceful as ever they acquired a number of vehicle mounted (coax & pintle) M240E1s from the Army. They replaced the spade grips and/or electric solenoid with pistol grip/buttstock & put them back into infantry service and type-classed them M240G.</p><p></p><p>The success of the experiment wasn't lost on the Army. When they fast tracked their own M60 replacement program they also went with the M240, but instead of modifying vehicle mount versions, they purchased new weapons that were factory built as infantry weapons. It became the M240B.</p><p></p><p>The USMC's M240G:</p><p></p><p><img src="http://world.guns.ru/machine/fn_mag_g.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>The US Army's M240B:</p><p></p><p><img src="http://world.guns.ru/machine/fn_mag_b.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>The most noticeable difference is the addition of a forward heat shield on the Army's version.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually the M240 & M249 are not <em>directly</em> related. There is a 7.62 version of the M249 in use with the US Navy (ie SEAL teams) known as the Mk 48 Mod 0 (in Navy nomenclature the M249 is the Mk 46).</p><p></p><p><img src="http://world.guns.ru/machine/mk48mod0_2.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>The adoption of the M240 in an infantry roll by the USMC/Army was merely a short term solution. There is a strong possibility that the Mk 48 will be the long term medium machine gun replacement for the US.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd have to see a larger picture of it say for certain. It's either a Mossberg 500, Remington 870 or Winchester 1300 w/aftermarket pistol grips.</p><p></p><p>If you can spot where the safety is located on the full size pic that will tell you which it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Krieg, post: 1371340, member: 5282"] I'm actually going to go back on what I said earlier. *gasp* lol I'm betting that the M60 on the cover of the book is actually supposed to be an M60E4 (rather than E3) which was a short-barreled variant used by the SEAL teams. Under Navy nomenclature it would be the Mk 43 Mod 0. I originally was thinking that the image on the cover was just poorly handled perspective, but I'm willing to bet the short barrel was intentional. [IMG]http://www.usord.com/images/M60E4_large.jpg[/IMG] In the early 90's the USMC wanted to replace the M60E3 but didn't have the cash to develop a new weapon or procure them from an outside source. As resourceful as ever they acquired a number of vehicle mounted (coax & pintle) M240E1s from the Army. They replaced the spade grips and/or electric solenoid with pistol grip/buttstock & put them back into infantry service and type-classed them M240G. The success of the experiment wasn't lost on the Army. When they fast tracked their own M60 replacement program they also went with the M240, but instead of modifying vehicle mount versions, they purchased new weapons that were factory built as infantry weapons. It became the M240B. The USMC's M240G: [IMG]http://world.guns.ru/machine/fn_mag_g.jpg[/IMG] The US Army's M240B: [IMG]http://world.guns.ru/machine/fn_mag_b.jpg[/IMG] The most noticeable difference is the addition of a forward heat shield on the Army's version. Actually the M240 & M249 are not [i]directly[/i] related. There is a 7.62 version of the M249 in use with the US Navy (ie SEAL teams) known as the Mk 48 Mod 0 (in Navy nomenclature the M249 is the Mk 46). [IMG]http://world.guns.ru/machine/mk48mod0_2.jpg[/IMG] The adoption of the M240 in an infantry roll by the USMC/Army was merely a short term solution. There is a strong possibility that the Mk 48 will be the long term medium machine gun replacement for the US. I'd have to see a larger picture of it say for certain. It's either a Mossberg 500, Remington 870 or Winchester 1300 w/aftermarket pistol grips. If you can spot where the safety is located on the full size pic that will tell you which it is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Weapons Locker info
Top