Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Weapons should break left and right
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 9772040" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>First, thanks for answering my question. Please allow me to lob in some more. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>So, less (or even no?) emphasis on exploration and-or downtime? OK.</p><p></p><p>Being able to do "cool naughty word" right out of the gate is fine but then how would long-term advancement work? Or would this be specifically designed toward short quick-hitting campaigns?</p><p></p><p>And thus the player would choose two classes, one from a list of combat classes and one from a list of social classes - am I reading that right?</p><p></p><p>If yes, interesting idea; but what would the social classes look like? Right now, other than maybe Bard, I can't think of any classes that aren't either combat-first or exploration-first; almost the whole list of social classes would have to be invented from scratch.</p><p></p><p>I've at times held the same sentiment in the past, until I realize I'd have no idea how to usefully replace it. Vancian is clunky as hell but it does serve one function well: by limiting what casters can do over x-amount of time it keeps non-casters viable to play. Taking those limits off means that to preserve even the vaguest hint of character balance either everyone would have to play a caster or nobody would, and I'm not sure how far that would fly.</p><p></p><p>One way to de-clunkify Vancian somewhat without completely breaking the game is to do away with any form of pre-memorization or spell preparation. Just have per-level slots, and if a spell's on your list or in your spellbook for that level and you've got a slot remaining of that level you can freely cast it. To rein it in a bit, the idea of upcasting or downcasting has to go away - you can <strong>only</strong> use 3rd-level slots on a 3rd-level spell, period - and spell effects would have to scale with level more, as they did in 3e and prior.</p><p></p><p>With this, all the player has to track is their slots remaining by level; they don't have to go through any sort of preparation or spell load-out each in-game day in play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 9772040, member: 29398"] First, thanks for answering my question. Please allow me to lob in some more. :) So, less (or even no?) emphasis on exploration and-or downtime? OK. Being able to do "cool naughty word" right out of the gate is fine but then how would long-term advancement work? Or would this be specifically designed toward short quick-hitting campaigns? And thus the player would choose two classes, one from a list of combat classes and one from a list of social classes - am I reading that right? If yes, interesting idea; but what would the social classes look like? Right now, other than maybe Bard, I can't think of any classes that aren't either combat-first or exploration-first; almost the whole list of social classes would have to be invented from scratch. I've at times held the same sentiment in the past, until I realize I'd have no idea how to usefully replace it. Vancian is clunky as hell but it does serve one function well: by limiting what casters can do over x-amount of time it keeps non-casters viable to play. Taking those limits off means that to preserve even the vaguest hint of character balance either everyone would have to play a caster or nobody would, and I'm not sure how far that would fly. One way to de-clunkify Vancian somewhat without completely breaking the game is to do away with any form of pre-memorization or spell preparation. Just have per-level slots, and if a spell's on your list or in your spellbook for that level and you've got a slot remaining of that level you can freely cast it. To rein it in a bit, the idea of upcasting or downcasting has to go away - you can [B]only[/B] use 3rd-level slots on a 3rd-level spell, period - and spell effects would have to scale with level more, as they did in 3e and prior. With this, all the player has to track is their slots remaining by level; they don't have to go through any sort of preparation or spell load-out each in-game day in play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Weapons should break left and right
Top